Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 46 to 53 of 53

Thread: Which stonks are you buying if any?

  1. #46
    Moderator Dr Mordrid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Westland, MI
    Posts
    26,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UtwigMU View Post
    One word: gamestonk

    As WSB said: We can stay retarded longer than they can stay solvent.
    I think this is a general frustration & counter-strike against predatory short-sellers; those who don't just make the bet but try to manipulate the market to get their preferred result.
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

  2. #47
    Super MURCer UtwigMU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    5,319

    Default

    So I'm autistic, doing my own thinking and my own research but my portfolio is overall down 0.5%. OK - first rule is to not loose money
    insurance company recovered to pre corona levels
    pharma up 30% + 5% dividend
    IBM down 10%
    MSFT up 6%

    If I were just a follow the crowd sheep and bought AAPL and TSLA i'd do great. I need to rethink being independent thinker. Seems being a sheep is the more successful life strategy.

  3. #48
    Moderator Dr Mordrid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Westland, MI
    Posts
    26,520

    Default

    Seems that way sometimes, and I definitely didn't get on the Game Stop bandwagon, but I agree something should be done with the predatory activity of some short-sellers. AIUI Japan, France, Spain, Italy and Belgium have taken some measures.
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

  4. #49
    Moderator dZeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    over there
    Posts
    4,614

    Default

    I'm reading reports of RobinHood users that are not allowed to exercise their GME call options... I'm not sure what's going on exactly behind the scenes, but it sounds like this is going to end very badly for RobinHood (and all its users) very soon.

  5. #50
    Moderator Dr Mordrid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Westland, MI
    Posts
    26,520

    Default

    Musk was on Clubhouse and asked Teney what happened,

    https://nypost.com/2021/02/01/elon-m...gamestop-saga/

    Under questioning from billionaire Tesla boss Elon Musk, Tenev broke down how Robinhood restricted trading on several “meme stocks” while under pressure from the National Securities Clearing Corporation, a financial institution that clears and settles stock trades between brokers.

    “Spill the beans, man — what happened last week?” Musk asked Tenev during an early Monday morning broadcast on Clubhouse, an audio-streaming app.

    “The people demand an answer, and they want to know the details and the truth,” he added.

    As Tenev explained, Robinhood has to deposit money with the clearinghouse — commonly known as the NSCC — based on several factors, such as the volatility of trading activity and “concentration intro certain securities.”

    At 3:30 a.m. Pacific time on Thursday — the morning after Reddit’s WallStreetBets message board sparked a flurry of trading in GameStop and other “meme stocks” — Robinhood received a request from the NSCC for a roughly $3 billion deposit, a far larger number than normal, according to Tenev.

    “Just to give context, Robinhood, up until that point, has raised … around $2 billion in total venture capital up until now,” Tenev said. “So it’s a big number.”

    The NSCC eventually lowered the request to $700 million after Robinhood officials outlined a plan to “manage risk” in GameStop and other volatile stocks on Thursday, according to Tenev.

    That was why Robinhood temporarily blocked traders from buying new GameStop shares, a move that sparked widespread outrage and several lawsuits. Robinhood has since allowed its customers to buy limited numbers of GameStop shares and options contracts.
    >
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

  6. #51
    Super MURCer UtwigMU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    5,319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Mordrid View Post
    Musk was on Clubhouse and asked Teney what happened,

    https://nypost.com/2021/02/01/elon-m...gamestop-saga/
    They didn't tell this at first, Webull had similar problems. I heard there were cals to Citadel and Robin Hood from higher ups.

    Anyway since it's not worth to buy less than 2k worth of shares in my current account and I'm not willing to drop 2k on meme stock I'm staying out.

    I was checking SPY (SP500) on tradingview and it's higher than a year ago pre covid with Trump in office and great economy while economy is objectively not as good. The steepness of curve has increased post covid due to all money printing. So the whole market could correct at some point. I have more cash than stocks.

  7. #52
    Crabby Smurf Umfriend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    7,118

    Default

    I am still, to my liking, somewhat overweight in stock. This is because I refuse to sell stock and rather write call options at prices where I would make a small profit. This works to some extent as long as the stock do not fall to far such that the option premium on a stock is close to zero (I dislike anything below 0.18). One option there is to buy additional stock and write an option at a bit above of purchase price but, of course, if it declines further I face the same issue. Objectively speaking, my strategy is absolutely bonkers. Still, that portfolio that I manage actively is, although a bit heavy in stock, running a good profit (because of the other stock in there).

    Should the two stocks rise, even if slowly, then I'll exit parts at pre-set prices though so in a way, if you believe that markets are generally overreacting, it is way to buy low and sell high and make some premium in between.

    If you are a saver and suffer from FOMO, then I would suggest putting part of monthly savings into mutual/equity funds (assuming low transaction cost). I think that for most (myself included) the best thing to do is slowly build up a position in trackers or funds (I wish there were funds that acted like trackers but I have not found any).

    I really like what is happening with GameStop and AMC but, of course, the enthousiasts are bound to lose money. It would have been better if they had some sort of valuation assuming no shorters and not buy above that. I would not entertain such a thing other than for very small amounts and just for fun.

    Funny thing: I've read a few articles in WaPo actually defending the private equity / hedge fund shorters with the idea that shorters have a real function to correct overvalued equity/firms. It is not without merit I believe but, as very often IMHO, people ignore the price setting power some parties have nowadays. In a perfect market, where no participant has any significant effect on price/volume, it makes sense. In real life, not so much. Anyway, that was my ramble for the day.
    Join MURCs Distributed Computing effort for Rosetta@Home and help fight Alzheimers, Cancer, Mad Cow disease and rising oil prices.
    [...]the pervading principle and abiding test of good breeding is the requirement of a substantial and patent waste of time. - Veblen

  8. #53
    Moderator Dr Mordrid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Westland, MI
    Posts
    26,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Umfriend View Post
    .
    >
    Funny thing: I've read a few articles in WaPo actually defending the private equity / hedge fund shorters with the idea that shorters have a real function to correct overvalued equity/firms. It is not without merit I believe but, as very often IMHO, people ignore the price setting power some parties have nowadays. In a perfect market, where no participant has any significant effect on price/volume, it makes sense. In real life, not so much. Anyway, that was my ramble for the day.
    Pretty much my feelings. My main beef are the predatory shorters who make the bet (fine) then go in front of every camera etc. evangelizing their position in a naked effort to drive the stock down.

    IMO SEC should rule this as much a violation as other manipulations.
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •