Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: G400 MAX fill rates

  1. #1

    Question G400 MAX fill rates

    Could someone check what their 3DMark2k2 SE fill rates are with the default settings? With my G400 MAX running at stock speed (150/200), Win98, PDesk 6.82, I get about 128 M/Texels/sec single texturing, and 160 multitexturing.

  2. #2
    MURCer roadie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Vauxhall, London
    Posts
    368

    Default

    will do, but it will have to wait a couple of weeks until i get home. those numbers look sort of right, but i think i get a little higher???
    Dell Inspiron 8200
    Pentium4m 1.6
    640mb pc2100
    64mb gf440go
    15" uxga ultrasharp
    40gb 5400rpm hdd 16mb cache

  3. #3

    Default

    That's what I was kinda thinking. When I upgraded from a ASUS CUBX (440BX based) with a Celeron 2 850 to a TUSL2-C (815EP) with a Tualatin Celeron 1.2 I noticed that my fill rates seemed to drop! I checked and the G400 is running at full speed, 150/200.

  4. #4
    MURCer roadie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Vauxhall, London
    Posts
    368

    Default

    i have not published a score with fillrates for 3dmark 2k1, but i did for 2k, and found for the single texture i got 295.8, and for multi 293.6. if you can run 3dmark 2k we can compare these scores
    Dell Inspiron 8200
    Pentium4m 1.6
    640mb pc2100
    64mb gf440go
    15" uxga ultrasharp
    40gb 5400rpm hdd 16mb cache

  5. #5

    Default

    [edit]

    Doh, that's not it... that was the benchmark from my CUBX. With my TUSL2-C I'm getting only 269.3 MTexels/s single and 268.0 MTexels/s multi. Strange.

    http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k=2407665

    [/edit]
    Last edited by Jon P. Inghram; 18th June 2002 at 06:20.

  6. #6
    MURCer roadie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Vauxhall, London
    Posts
    368
    Dell Inspiron 8200
    Pentium4m 1.6
    640mb pc2100
    64mb gf440go
    15" uxga ultrasharp
    40gb 5400rpm hdd 16mb cache

  7. #7

    Default

    http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k=2407665

    Heres mine for comparison, there isnt much differance in fill rates, howerver i suck in texture rendering tests, propbaly because i have 16mb version. However it is clocked at 150/200
    Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe (nForce2)>>AMD 2500+@ 3200+ (Barton)>>1.5 GB Ram (PC400)>>Leadtek GF 6800 12x6(385/850)>>Western Digital 120GB (WD1200JB) & Fujitsu 20Gb(MPF3204AT)>>Cambridge Audio azur 540A>>Razer Viper(Mouse)>>V7 V7S20PD 20.1 TFT Monitor>>NEC 3510A>>Lite-ON (40x10)>>Cherry CyMotion>>CanoScan N670U>>Epson Stylus Color 760>>Windows XP (SP2)



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Fill Rates
    By xbnmx in forum Matrox Hardware
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 16th March 2002, 17:27
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 4th May 2000, 07:15
  3. About refresh rates with Max ???
    By Bad Sector in forum Matrox Hardware
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 6th December 1999, 03:47
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 4th December 1999, 01:13
  5. Refresh rates for G400 Max Question
    By Saturn in forum Matrox Hardware
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 25th November 1999, 21:39

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •