Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Benchmarking

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Benchmarking

    For anyone who wants to bitch about posting of 5.21 results =P, GO GET LAID! Ok, I ran q3 demo tests 5.14 and then 5.21 and here are my results. O yeah, w98se, pII450, 128ram. BTW, how do run unreal demo tests?

    Quake3test 1.08
    5.14 5.21
    demo1
    800x600
    16bit 36.7 37.1
    32bit 36.4 36.2
    1024x768
    16bit 33.2 35.7
    32bit 32.7 34.1
    1280x960
    16bit 21.9 31.0
    32bit 21.1 24.1

    demo2
    800x600
    16bit 35.5 35.9
    32bit 35.3 35.7
    1024x768
    16bit 33.2 35.1
    32bit 32.8 34.9
    1280x960
    16bit 25.8 32.4
    32bit 25.2 27.7


    Asus K7V
    Athlon 700
    128mb PC133 HSDRAM
    Matrox Millennium g400max
    Adaptec 2940U2W
    IBM 9gb U2W
    Plextor 8/20 cdr
    Diamond MX300
    3com 905b-tx

  • #2
    win98-SE huh? well....

    Comment


    • #3
      Well looking at those tests it looks like the improvements have been reserved for the higher resolutions. The lower results can be discarded as differances between the runs.
      Unfortunatly not everyone has large monitors and can't run high res without damaging their eyes so if those results are repeated across the board it's bad news for those guys.
      Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
      Weather nut and sad git.

      My Weather Page

      Comment


      • #4
        Those high-res scores don't mean much to me... If the drivers was to be optimized, then the lower resolutions should have gotten a good kick. That highresolution increase is something else. What I dunno.

        Comment


        • #5
          Its a good thing you are using a decimal point. Or it would be hard to tell the improvements! hahahha Im going to get Laid anyway!

          ------------------
          PIII-450, 128 HDSRAM, Asus P3BF, G400/32, SBLive!, Nokia 447Xi 17",

          Comment

          Working...
          X