Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

James Cameron op-ed: commercial space use 'right way'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • James Cameron op-ed: commercial space use 'right way'

    OpEd in the Washington Post.

    Cameron served on the NASA Advisory Council from 2003-2005

    Link.....

    The right way forward on space exploration

    By James Cameron Friday, February 5, 2010

    What do rockets burn for fuel? Money. Money that is contributed by working families who have mortgages and children who need braces. And why do the American people support our efforts in space? Because they still believe, to some extent or another, in that shining dream of exploring other worlds. So it could be said that rockets really run on dreams.

    The exploration of space is the grandest adventure challenging the human race. As a filmmaker I have celebrated this greatest of dreams in my movies and documentaries, and I remain as passionate about the discoveries ahead as I was when I was a kid. So it was with some trepidation that I waited for the NASA budget to be unveiled this week. I was concerned that amid the nation's fiscal crises, space exploration would fall off the priority list. But the NASA budget reveals a pathway to a bright future of exploration. It simply reflects the deep changes and hard decisions necessary to accomplish that goal.

    Last year President Obama instructed the Augustine commission to report on the likely prognosis for NASA's exploration activities. After months of study, the conclusions the panel released in October were gloomy. The Constellation program, designed to put humans back on the moon by 2020, could not possibly succeed within that time frame or budgeted amount, it reported.

    In response, the president and NASA have crafted a bold plan that truly makes possible this nation's dreams for space. Their plan calls for the full embrace of commercial solutions for transporting astronauts to low Earth orbit after the space shuttle is retired this year. This frees NASA to do what it does best: deep space exploration, both robotic and human. By selecting commercial solutions for transportation to the international space station, NASA is empowering American free enterprise to do what it does best: develop technology quickly and efficiently in a competitive environment.

    As Peter Diamandis, chairman of the nonprofit X Prize Foundation, wrote this week: "The U.S. Government doesn't build your computers, nor do you fly aboard a U.S. Government owned and operated airline. Private industry routinely takes technologies pioneered by the government and turns them into cheap, reliable and robust industries." When the shuttle is finally retired after about three decades of service, the United States will be dependent on the Russian Soyuz to get our astronauts to the international space station, at a cost of $50 million per person. But under the new NASA plan, private industry will take over this capability within a few years, much more quickly than Constellation would have, and at a competitive price.

    The money saved will be plowed into research and development of robotic explorers that will act as precursors and technology demonstrators, paving the way for human exploration of the moon, asteroids and Mars. Additional funding has been committed to the development of advanced propulsion technology, which can bring down the cost of spaceflight. And the space station's lifespan will be extended several years, which in turn will increase the science yield and satisfy our international partners. This cooperative international effort is important as a model for how future large-scale missions will be organized and funded. In addition, money is being made available to both Earth and planetary science, which can help us understand climate change on our own world and the processes at work on some of the other worlds in our solar system.

    Over the past 15 years, I have gotten to know a lot of people at NASA while working on projects to advance space and ocean exploration. I've found that many, if not most, started as starry-eyed childhood dreamers. Maybe they loved science-fiction stories, with their promise of alien worlds, or maybe they were geeks like me, peering through a telescope in the back yard until their moms yelled again for them to come inside -- "It's a school night!" They grew up to become engineers, brilliant planetary scientists and steely-eyed missile men who collectively have pushed our human presence out to the moon and our robotic presence not just to Mars but also to the outer reaches of the solar system. I applaud President Obama's bold decision for NASA to focus on building a space exploration program that can drive innovation and provide inspiration for the world. This is the path that can make our dreams in space a reality.
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

  • #2
    The only problem I have with this is the fact that NASA, for the longest time, has been used as the official "declassification" agency for militarily useful technologies to be civilian-ized and introduced to the public. I wonder if this is a sign that this venue will be closing.
    Hey, Donny! We got us a German who wants to die for his country... Oblige him. - Lt. Aldo Raine

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Dr Mordrid View Post
      Cameron served on the NASA Advisory Council from 2003-2005
      Why?
      Chuck
      秋音的爸爸

      Comment


      • #4
        Maybe because he has some visions/ideas about technology that are not too far off?
        Case in point: for his movie "the abyss", he designed (or lead the design of) unmanned underwater and even manned underwatervehicles for great depth with great agility. They looked very realistic but did not exist at the time. The first ones that were made some years after that movie closely resemble the designs from the movies. I'm pretty sure Nasa has some futurists working for them, so he probably fits in that category.
        pixar
        Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow. (James Dean)

        Comment


        • #5
          Precisely. They've had numerous futurists, writers etc. as members;

          Miles O'Brian - former NBC science corespondent now doing it on the web, blogger, writer and current member of the council.

          Susan Eisenhower - futurist/consultant, granddaughter of Ike and once wife/collaborator of former Russian Space Research Institute director Roald Sagdeev.

          Hugh Downs - newsman & host of ABC's 20/20 but also science writer/futurist, member of the National Academy of Science, science consultant for Westinghouse Labs and the Ford Foundation etc.

          you get the idea.....but let's also not forget that between films Cameron has done quite a bit of real science, much at the bottom of the sea which closely correlates to aspects of space travel.
          Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 5 February 2010, 10:30.
          Dr. Mordrid
          ----------------------------
          An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

          I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

          Comment

          Working...
          X