Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A realy cool cd player deesign
Collapse
X
-
-
really cool CD player designs
A pair of Shanlings (note tube output):
A C.E.C belt driven transport:
Q9450 + TRUE, G.Skill 2x2GB DDR2, GTX 560, ASUS X48, 1TB WD Black, Windows 7 64-bit, LG M2762D-PM 27" + 17" LG 1752TX, Corsair HX620, Antec P182, Logitech G5 (Blue)
Laptop: MSI Wind - Black
Comment
-
I'm glad that the comments on Murc is not as retarded as the ones on the linked pageIf there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
Comment
-
-
BTW, belt driven or tube-output designs might also look nice, but are also stupid.
Comment
-
Haven't actually listened to a tube output cd player, but I've listened to a lower model CEC with belt drive- sounded great.
thr not stpid ur stoopidQ9450 + TRUE, G.Skill 2x2GB DDR2, GTX 560, ASUS X48, 1TB WD Black, Windows 7 64-bit, LG M2762D-PM 27" + 17" LG 1752TX, Corsair HX620, Antec P182, Logitech G5 (Blue)
Laptop: MSI Wind - Black
Comment
-
Can someone please explain why a belt drive would sound better than a direct drive? There is no such thing as wow and flutter possible with CDs. You could have speed variations as muxh as you like and it would not make a ha'porth of difference to the sound quality. In fact, the speed varies according to the radius being read, anyway.
I agree with az: STUPID!Brian (the devil incarnate)
Comment
-
The only reason I can think of is less vibration? And maybe less EMI from motor? Still stupid idea though
Brian.
If I put a 1khz pure sine wave at 0db @ 16/44, and played back digitally from wav and then from a cd. They should both be bit for bit exactly the same?
Or will other frequencies be introduced?Last edited by Fluff; 14 August 2007, 10:16.______________________________
Nothing is impossible, some things are just unlikely.
Comment
Comment