Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NIC card made for gamers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NIC card made for gamers

    400Mhz processor and 64MB of PC2100 DDR memory, packet optimization....

    Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.

  • #2
    dumb
    P.S. You've been Spanked!

    Comment


    • #3
      32 Bit PCI? No PCI-e? Puhleeze....

      Pardon me whilst I stick with my 64Bit PCI-X Intel NICs...
      Hey, Donny! We got us a German who wants to die for his country... Oblige him. - Lt. Aldo Raine

      Comment


      • #4
        Gigabit on 32bit 33mhz PCI is a waste. Reminds me of when Promise starting coming out with Serial ATA cards for PCI.

        Comment


        • #5
          has very little to do with bandwidth, its all about latency, in theory* it should help.
          Q9450 + TRUE, G.Skill 2x2GB DDR2, GTX 560, ASUS X48, 1TB WD Black, Windows 7 64-bit, LG M2762D-PM 27" + 17" LG 1752TX, Corsair HX620, Antec P182, Logitech G5 (Blue)
          Laptop: MSI Wind - Black

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by |Mehen|
            has very little to do with bandwidth, its all about latency, in theory* it should help.
            Why should it help? If the data I need is cached on the NIC, how is that helping me? It's still not on the wire(outbound) or in the CPU(inbound), where I need it.
            Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

            Comment


            • #7
              Did you read the article?
              Q9450 + TRUE, G.Skill 2x2GB DDR2, GTX 560, ASUS X48, 1TB WD Black, Windows 7 64-bit, LG M2762D-PM 27" + 17" LG 1752TX, Corsair HX620, Antec P182, Logitech G5 (Blue)
              Laptop: MSI Wind - Black

              Comment


              • #8
                First, it's a press release, not an article. But yes, I read it.

                Utilizing a 400MHz network processor with 64MB of dedicated PC-2100 DDR memory,
                Home users don't use jumbo frames at all, and games use lots of small packets. What are you going to do with 64MB onboard? And if you were going to cache, why use a relatively high latency memory system? A smaller amount of on-die cache is much smarter.

                MaxFPS technology frees up CPU cycles typically taken up by heavy network traffic by offloading the required processing onto the Killer NIC’s 400MHz network processor.
                What NIC doesn't do some of that these days? And what desktop machine has its CPU weighed down with network traffic (notice I'm excluding servers. Notice also that they aren't targetting the server market? hmmm).

                UltimatePing technology lowers ping by optimizing data delivery to games faster while PingThrottle technology allows users to increase or decrease ping accordingly. GameFirst Technology prioritizes network packets for games instead of background downloading utilities such as BitTorrent.
                Not enough detail here, but this sounds like QoS, or it at least serves the same function.

                While NVIDIA has implemented features similar to MaxFPS and GameFirst in the form of its FirstPacket and TCP/IP offload functions of the nForce 500 series of chipsets, the Killer NIC is the first standalone network card to offer such features.
                So other companies already do this (like I said), and they do it without dedicated RAM?

                This is a gimmick. I bet it has no performance increase compared to using a home router with QoS enabled.
                Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                Comment


                • #9
                  LOL what a waste of hardware design effort. Whatever group of engineers made that thing must have no self respect. Its a 100% Marketecture product.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    ExtremeTech is the Web's top destination for news and analysis of emerging science and technology trends, and important software, hardware, and gadgets.
                    Q9450 + TRUE, G.Skill 2x2GB DDR2, GTX 560, ASUS X48, 1TB WD Black, Windows 7 64-bit, LG M2762D-PM 27" + 17" LG 1752TX, Corsair HX620, Antec P182, Logitech G5 (Blue)
                    Laptop: MSI Wind - Black

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      This will be a "prove it to me first" product. Now, if I were a tweaker and had one of those "tricked out" plexiglass windows on my case, I might get it for the kewlness factor when people look inside. But since I'm not, I want to see independent evidence first.
                      “Inside every sane person there’s a madman struggling to get out”
                      –The Light Fantastic, Terry Pratchett

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Kinda useless. Marketing indeed.
                        Titanium is the new bling!
                        (you heard from me first!)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Jammrock
                          This will be a "prove it to me first" product.
                          That's what I was thinking. I just hope it doesn't fall through the cracks because of all the early skepticism. If it works at a reasonable price: great - I'll take one, if not, kudos for trying.
                          Q9450 + TRUE, G.Skill 2x2GB DDR2, GTX 560, ASUS X48, 1TB WD Black, Windows 7 64-bit, LG M2762D-PM 27" + 17" LG 1752TX, Corsair HX620, Antec P182, Logitech G5 (Blue)
                          Laptop: MSI Wind - Black

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by High_Jumbllama
                            Gigabit on 32bit 33mhz PCI is a waste. Reminds me of when Promise starting coming out with Serial ATA cards for PCI.
                            Actually, the SATA cards for PCI are less of a waste: it would allow you to connect SATA drives on a PC that wouldn't normally support it. While it might not perform well, there might be situations in which this could be useful.

                            But for the NIC card...


                            Jörg
                            pixar
                            Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow. (James Dean)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Actually, it's not really a waste at all - yeah, SATA has higher bandwith than PCI...but which consumer HDD can approach either of them?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X