Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stella awards - can these really be true?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stella awards - can these really be true?

    This is that time of the year in the US for reviewing the winners of the
    annual Stella Awards - named after 81-year-old Stella Liebeck, who
    spilled coffee on herself and successfully sued McDonald's.

    That case inspired the Stella awards for the most frivolous successful
    lawsuits in the United States.

    Here are this year's winners from the bottom up:

    - Fifth Place (tie): Kathleen Robertson of Austin, Texas, was awarded
    $780,000 by a jury of her peers after breaking her ankle tripping over a
    toddler who was running inside a furniture store. The owners of the
    store were understandably surprised at the verdict, considering the
    misbehaving little Toddler was Ms. Robertson's son.

    - Fifth Place (tie): Nineteen-year-old Carl Truman of Los Angeles won
    $74,000 and medical expenses, when his neighbour ran over his hand with
    a Honda Accord. Mr. Truman apparently failed to notice that there was
    someone at the wheel of the car, while he was trying to steal his neighbour's
    hubcaps.

    - Fifth Place (tie): Terrence Dickson of Bristol, Pennsylvania, was
    leaving a house he had just finished robbing by way of the garage.

    He was not able to get the garage door to go up since the automatic door
    opener was malfunctioning.

    He couldn't re-enter the house because the door connecting the house and
    garage locked when he pulled it shut.

    The family was on vacation, and Mr. Dickson found himself locked in the
    garage for eight days.

    He subsisted on a case of Pepsi he found, and a large bag of dry dog
    food. He sued the homeowner's insurance claiming the situation caused him
    undue mental anguish. The jury agreed to the tune of $500,000.

    - Fourth Place: Jerry Williams of Little Rock, Arkansas, was awarded
    $14,500 and medical expenses after being bitten on the rear end by his next door
    neighbour's beagle. The beagle was on a chain in it's owner's fenced
    yard.

    The award was less than sought because the jury felt the dog might have
    been just a little provoked at the time by Mr. Williams, who had climbed over
    the fence into the yard and was shooting it repeatedly with a pellet gun.

    - Third Place: A Philadelphia restaurant was ordered to pay Amber
    Carson, of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, $113,500 after she slipped on a soft drink and
    broke her coccyx (tail bone).

    The beverage was on the floor because Ms Carson had thrown it at her
    boyfriend 30 seconds earlier during an argument.

    - Second Place: Kara Walton of Claymont, Delaware, successfully sued the
    owner of a night club in a neighbouring city when she fell from the
    bathroom window to the floor and knocked out her two front teeth.

    This occurred while Ms Walton was trying to sneak through the window in
    the ladies room to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge. She was awarded
    $12,000 and dental expenses.

    - First Place: This year's runaway winner was Mrs. Merv Grazinski of
    Oklahoma City, OK.

    Mrs. Grazinski purchased a brand new 32-foot Winnebago motor home.

    On her first trip home (from an OU football game), having driven onto
    the freeway, she set the cruise control at 70 mph and calmly left the
    driver's seat to go into the back & make herself a sandwich.

    Not surprisingly, the RV left the freeway, crashed and overturned. Mrs.
    Grazinski sued Winnebago for not explaining in the owner's manual that
    cruise control isn't automatic pilot. The jury awarded her $1,750,000
    plus a new motor home!
    FT.

  • #2
    Not True

    A bouquet of outrageous lawsuits demonstrates the need for tort reform?

    Comment


    • #3
      I bet there are plenty of real examples that are just as ridiculous!
      FT.

      Comment


      • #4
        Tort reform thus has both its advocates and its adversaries. On the one hand, we bridle at the thought of the terminally clueless being rewarded for their folly — that strikes us as just plain wrong. We also fear for the continued wellbeing of the small- to mid-sized business which can ill afford to fend off one frivolous lawsuit after another and thus stands in danger of being litigated to death. Also, even when litigants do not prevail, costs associated with their suits rain down onto the average citizen through his taxes (some of which underwrite the judicial system) and through increased prices for goods produced by firms who had to mount legal defences. Yet on the other hand, we don't want to see those who have legitimate cause denied their right to sue (or in the case of the seriously injured, their right to sue for an appropriate amount). We also don't want to see corporations run unchecked, free to turn out whatever dangerous product they like because the combination of capped awards and their deep pockets render them bulletproof.

        It's a complicated issue, one not made any easier to make sense of by lists of fake cases of horrendous miscarriages of justice. One has to wonder why someone is so busy trying to stir up outrage and who or what that outrage would ultimately benefit.
        Thus the simpleminded are convinced that tort reform is a good thing, so that megacorps can have their way with impunity. Now they can dump toxic waste on playgrounds and the horrifically injured children have no meaningful remedy.

        Comment


        • #5
          True Stella Awards

          If you're interested in real stupid lawsuits, pay a visit to Randy Cassingham's True Stella Awards.

          Lord Zog, the Wildly Confused
          (long-time lurker)

          Comment


          • #6
            Welcome, Lord_Zog.



            ~~DukeP~~

            Comment


            • #7
              I just scraped the back left corner of my car on a telegraph pole, which was in my blind spot Can I sue the state telegraph monopoly for inconsiderately sticking the pole in a place (actually at the side of the carriageway) which was a danger to cars? I want £50 for polishing out the damage to the paintwork and £1,000,000 because I was so angry with myself that my blood pressure rose 10 mm, causing a risk of a CVA which may have been fatal and another £1,000,000 for moral tort because of the anguish of having to sue them. Or should I sue Honda, equally, because the trajectory I took while reversing hid the pole from either the LH rear-view mirror or throught the rear window? They were negligent in having a blind zone and not fitting a CCTV system to cover it. Also, there was no reversing "bleeper" so that the pole could not hop out of the way while I was backing into it.

              PS I'm ashamed to admit the basic fact is true
              Brian (the devil incarnate)

              Comment


              • #8
                DOnt be ashamed, Brian. These things happen.

                Just admit to the fact that, yes, You are now too old to safely drive a car.



                (And yes, had you been one of the youngsters, I would have pointed out that you werent old enough to drive).



                ~~DukeP~~

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by DukeP
                  DOnt be ashamed, Brian. These things happen.

                  Just admit to the fact that, yes, You are now too old to safely drive a car.



                  (And yes, had you been one of the youngsters, I would have pointed out that you werent old enough to drive).



                  ~~DukeP~~


                  You may be right but I bet I'm a safer driver than 99% of the other drivers on the Cypriot roads! I still have good eyesight without any narrowing of the vision and my reaction times are still good, with anticipation of what the other idiot is likely to do. I'm not a hat-bearing fuddy-duddy driving along at 30 km/h, either. My normal driving speed is as road conditions dictate or the speed limit +10% (the tolerance of radar traps here ), whichever is the lower. I would guess I've probably driven about 1,250,000 km and I've never lost a penny of no claims bonus or caused an accident involving a third party (other than a couple of parking scrapes).
                  Brian (the devil incarnate)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Fact is that a lot of companies, who in this nation make up the vast majority of employers (and I'd bet in most others as well), are the ones who get hammered the most by tort lawsuits. The big companies can tie them up in court forever just using procedural motions.

                    Then we have the matter of medical lawsuits, which I can say for certain are about 70% bogus or excessive.

                    IMO all lawsuits should go to an independent arbitor of fact before they ever see a judge or jury for judgement of damages. At least then maybe we could get some of the junk science out of the courtroom.

                    Dr. Mordrid
                    Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 10 September 2005, 12:17.
                    Dr. Mordrid
                    ----------------------------
                    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

                    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X