Doom3 scores

[Helevitia]

Specs in sig:

High Quality

10x7:
37.7

8x6:
47.2

8x6 w/4X(game setting):
28.6


Ultra Quality settings

1600x1200 w/ 16XAA(game setting):
14.2

[bsdgeek]

Originally posted by bsdgeek
640x480 'timedemo demo1'
Low quality, No advanced effects: 34.6
Med quality, No advanced effects: 32.6
- Plus High Quality Effects: 32.6
- Plus Specular: 32.0
- Plus Bump Mapping: 31.0
- Plus Shadows: 25.4

800x600
Med quality, all effects: 23.1
- Shadows off: 30.4

XP1800+, 512MB PC2100, ECS K7S5A, SBLive 5.1 & GF3 Ti500. For scores with Parhelia, simply divide by two.

[xortam]

I'll have to run some benches this morning. I was running the detected setting of HQ at 16x12 last night at full tilt (can't get 19x12 working yet). I then tried Ultra and it was really nice so I oc'ed the CPU some. Bumped the 2.8 GB P4 up 20% to 3.36 GB at 1:1 AGP and ran Ultra full tilt at 16x12!!!. Shiznit!!! I haven't even tried bumping up the BFG 6088 oc yet. Time to take off the leash and see what the timedemo does this morning ...

The Utra settings look way much better than HQ ... I was shocked at the difference. This game looks sharp as a tack feeding it digitally to my UWXGA 23" LCD and its smooth as silk. What more can one want?! Looks like I'm an NVIDIA man this go ... sorry ATI ... you didn't get your act together in time for me.

[Helevitia]

So where's the numbers?

[xortam]

Originally posted by Helevitia
So where's the numbers?

Actually just getting around to playing with it. I also want to see if my system will reach its targeted 25 percent oc -- the memory is guaranteed to run at that speed. I'm going to play with oc'ing on the GPU as well as I hear there's some life left in these BFG ocs. Don't know how much I'll get done tonight but I need to decide for sure on this card by tomorrow (30 day return). Just came back to my old PC to check again on how to get into the console.

[deed]

High Quality

1024x768:36.2

800x600:46.5

xp2600+ 512m pc2700 fx5800

[xortam]

Re: Doom3 scores

2.8 GHz P4 oc'ed 20% to 3.36 Ghz
BFG 6800 GT oc
1 GB Corsair TwinX1024-4000 DDR Memory

High Quality

10x7:
52.2

8x6:
53.6

8x6 w/4X(game setting):
52.2

Interesting it didn't suffer so tried 8x ...
36.7

Ultra Quality settings

1600x1200 w/ 16XAA(game setting):
6.7

The 16x AA really knocks it to its knees, but who runs AA at 16x12 and above (my 19x12)?

Decided to try for my golden 25% oc and I was delighted to see it ran this Ultra test with my 2.8 GHz P4 now running at 3.5 GHz and my goal is met by getting the 1 GHz bandwidth through the memory. Very happy to see this system running at my target rates so I can handle the video processing I want. The Ultra test netted the same result, 6.7 FPS, so the GPU is limiting this run. I'll try bumping up the GPU tomorrow (later today).

P.S. Amazingly, my CPU own heats up a couple degrees through all of this.

P.P.S. -- Disregard these numbers as I've found that I didn't benchmark correctly and these numbers are all somewhat lower than actual. I'll repost later with more and accurate numbers.

[Indiana]

CPU: A64 3200+ @2200MHz, 512MB RAM. WinXP SP2
Radeon X800 Pro VIVO @XT @540/571; Catalyst 4.9Beta

-1280x1024, Ultra High Quality: 66,0 fps
-1280x1024, Ultra High Quality, shadows off: 83,5 fps
-1280x1024, Ultra High Quality, 4xAA: 44,1 fps
-1280x1024, Ultra High Quality, 4xAA, shadows off: 67,6 fps

[Admiral]

1152x864, High Quality, 16x AF Performance, no AA

~37 fps

edit: on Radeon 9700 Pro @ 380/700, other specs in sig.

[Admiral]

Changed the Radeon 9700 Pro with a Leadtek 6800 nu today.

new score, 1024x768, high quality, 16 AF, 2x Quincunx AA -> 52.2 fps

[Novdid]

Quincunx??? bleh...

(Excuse the rudeness)

[Admiral]

what's wrong with it, I rather like it

[Indiana]

Qiuncunx doesn't really do antialiasing, it's more or less simple blurring, that's what's wrong with it.
I'd rather not use any AA than Quincunx which really degrades image quality.

Why don't you use one of the real antialiasing settings? Your card should be fast enough still...

[Helevitia]

I just ordered my X800 XT. Once I get it in, I'll throw up some numbers.

[Evildead666]

High Quality

10*7 -> 47.6fps
8*6 -> 64.7fps

Medium Quality

10*7 -> 53.3fps
8*6 -> 71.5fps

Main rig, which is now stable.
Athlon XP Mobile 2500+@2588MHz
2xCorsair 512Mb XXL PC3200 2-2-2-10 @207
Gigabyte GA-7NNXP mobo.
9800pro @ 418/380(760 DDR)

edit: Cooled with a Hydor 1200l/h pump and a 1-a cooling HV-3 block.
Black Ice Extreme 2x120mm size Radiator with 2x120mm papst @7V.
36C full load. 1.775V Rock solid.
tried 13x and 13.5x and 14x and 15x, but couldnt get above 133mhz fsb.
Best option, and the one it would stably boot at, was 12.5x207. The memory bandwidth at 2-3-3-10 was only worth it if i could get the fsb above 215, and at 215 the system locked all the time very rapidly, which made getting into the bios and undoing it very difficult. i'm happy now. will stop pissing around with it and just play doom3.

just for fun:
Aquamark3 : 47464
3DM'03: 6487

Doom3 is very fluid in 10*7 in High quality, there is only a very slight lag whenever an enemy is 'spawned'. so i know when they are just around the corner not all the time, but most of the time...
Might go for a 6600 when they come out, seeing as i wont be upgrading now until the NV50 and R500 are out...