Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why I am forced to use Matrox

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why I am forced to use Matrox

    If I sit down in front of a computer using any other brand of video card, I quickly develop a strong feeling of agitation and inability to concentrate. This can last for a while after I've stopped looking at the screen too. This isn't the monitors' fault.

    However, when I plug in a Matrox card, this doesn't happen at all. If anything, I feel the opposite.

    I suppose I must be one of those rare people who is neurologically hypersensitive to abnormal light information.

    My assumption is that Matrox video cards give a proper signal output for a section of the colour spectrum, which other brands of video card do not manage to do. My S3 onboard video looks noticably bluish, and it is the worst of all for me to use.

    So despite my nickname, I'm using a decade old Matrox Millennium (my G400 died) with 2mb of vram. I simply can not suffer using a computer with a non-Matrox video card installed.

    However, I also can not suffer paying for a Matrox Parhelia Do not worry, I am not begging for donations They cost equal to what is over a week's pay here.

    Matrox cards are in such demand on the second-hand market that I've seen bidding wars over 4mb models.

    I'll be buying a 2nd hand Gxxx when possible.

    Could this be considered to be a vindication of the superiority of Matrox visual quality?

    If only Matrox could re-enter the mass market like how things were 5 years ago.
    Matrox G4x0 32mb SG RAM DVI

  • #2
    Geez, how much could I get for my 4mb Millenium 2? I have one just sitting here collecting dust (actually it was my original video card from my very first home-built computer! That old Pentium 200 kicked butt, especially when I attached my Canopus Pure3D with 6mb of ram to it for 3D stuff.) Ah, memories....

    Leech
    Wah! Wah!

    In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

    Comment


    • #3
      perhaps trying one of the more, err, modern video cards might alieviate your problems. the radeon 9xxx series was pretty highly acclaimed for analog quality.

      or, you could always just go to DVI :P
      "And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz

      Comment


      • #4
        Yeah, hard to beat digital LCD for normal desktop work type stuff, especially reading.

        Comment


        • #5
          Suprisingly, I'm not seeing much difference between my new Geforce FX5900 and my Parhelia in regards to 2D...
          Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!

          Comment


          • #6
            what res/refresh do you run/what monitor ?
            "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

            "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

            Comment


            • #7
              with a 2mb Millennium it cannot be too high...
              "And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz

              Comment


              • #8
                Running at 1600x1200@85hz on Samsung 900NF 19" CRT. Secondary display is a 15" Sony HMD-A100 at 1024x768@85hz.
                Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!

                Comment


                • #9
                  errkkk... yeah... reading the thread acctually helps from time to time...
                  "And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    My big problem is when I sit down at someone else's computer and can tell that the refresh rate isn't set properly. I get massive headaches at anything less than 85Hz.

                    A few years ago a customer sent me to a software training seminar for a new payroll system because they'd just fired the staff person that was scheduled to attend and needed me to learn the package and train their eventual replacement. Their lab consisted of old Pentium machines running windows 95 and all the monitors were set at 60Hz. I seemed to recall that windows 95 asked for the install cd when you played with certain control panel settings so I didn't want to risk changing the refresh rate myself. It was only a 2 day course. I survived by turning my monitor off as much as possible when I didn't need the computer and rushing really quickly through the practical exercises when I did.
                    P.S. You've been Spanked!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Speaking of refresh rates....

                      At the Hell that is my workplace, I'm just a peon monkey boy, yet whenever the clerk there has a computer problem, she usually asks me to fix it. Usually they're just dumb problems. But one of them (which I think I've described elsewhere in a WindowsXP rant) was that when the tech upgraded all the systems to Windows XP (from Windows 2000, which I'm STILL wondering WHY, since all that s used on it are a couple of old dosbased programs and IE and Excel.) the refresh rate went back to the default of 60hz. Why on earth can't windows XP detect the EDID of the monitor and just simply choose the proper refresh rate?

                      She whined to me that she was getting ill looking at her flickering screen

                      Leech
                      Wah! Wah!

                      In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        It is unbelievable how many work-place computers are permanently set to 60Hz.

                        Anyway, that hasn't been my problem. My last monitor was 85Hz, and I recently got an LCD.

                        I've got it at 1152x864@16bpp. Which isn't the LCD's native resolution, but it's good enough. It can do 256 colours at 1280x1024, but the web browser has kittens. 256 colour mode is surprisingly tolerable otherwise.
                        Matrox G4x0 32mb SG RAM DVI

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          My old monitor burn out... i got 14' Daewoo (1996) &i'm working on 800x600x32bppx60Hz .... ;( What do to.. my eyes will die soon ...
                          A CRAY is the only computer that runs an endless loop in just 4 hours...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            ok... with an LCD you probably will not have 100% accurate color reproduction anyways. but... considering it is an LCD and I am guessing an analog one... and considering the fact you will want it at either 60hz or 75hz... i am pretty sure than just about any card on the market now days will provide equivilent picture output with similar or better signal quality over your Millennium 2...
                            "And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Nicram
                              My old monitor burn out... i got 14' Daewoo (1996) &i'm working on 800x600x32bppx60Hz .... ;( What do to.. my eyes will die soon ...
                              having 60Hz on 14" isn't as bad as having it on 17" or bigger.

                              I used to be perfectly happy to 70Hz on my 14" KFC @ 1024x768. When I moved to 21" HP, I found that nothing suited for me at first. It took few days to get used to higher refresh rates. (and yep, I did have headaches on having 120Hz @ 1280x960 during those few first days...)
                              "Dippadai"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X