Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NASA Finds Flaw Could Have Doomed Another Shuttle

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NASA Finds Flaw Could Have Doomed Another Shuttle

    CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (Reuters) - NASA has discovered a potentially disastrous mistake made more than 20 years ago on the space shuttle Discovery and plans to replace key parts on all three of its shuttles, the space agency said on Monday.

    Gears were installed backward on the speed brakes in Discovery's tail section and could have failed under the stress of an emergency landing, said William Parsons, the shuttle program manager.

    "The bottom line was, it was not good," said Parsons, who told reporters the Discovery had flown safely 30 times since 1984 without the gears causing a problem.

    The most likely scenario for a disaster would have come if the shuttle had needed to make an emergency landing at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida after an aborted launch, when the aerodynamic stress on the gears would have been greatest.

    The reversed gears were found in an actuator that works the speed brakes, which are essentially flaps that flare out from the tail section to create aerodynamic drag and slow the shuttle. Small cracks and some corrosion were also found, surprising NASA engineers.

    After the original actuators were replaced, NASA also tested extra replacement parts built 17 years ago, and found that one of the spare actuators also had the gears reversed.

    Discovery is NASA's oldest remaining shuttle after the loss of the Challenger in 1986 and the Columbia in 2003. It has been chosen as the first craft to resume flying once the post-Columbia suspension of shuttle missions ends.

    That Discovery mission is scheduled for March 2005, and Parsons said the added work would not necessarily cause a delay.

    Parts are being stripped from the newer shuttle Endeavour to be installed on Discovery, but eventually NASA said it will have new parts on all three remaining shuttles. Atlantis is the third.

    Parsons said the fault had been traced to the installation by a contractor, Hamilton Sunstrand of Rockford, Illinois, which had reviewed its procedures and found there was nothing to prevent the gears being installed backward.

    "Yes, I'm surprised. It's a process escape that shouldn't have happened," said Parsons, who became the shuttle chief after the Columbia disaster and has overseen the $250 million return-to-flight effort.
    "Hamilton Sunstrand has found new ways to do this. This won't happen again," he said.
    The company's program manager for the parts, Rudy Valdez, said the actuators are configured in mirror-image pairs, but the gears themselves are identical and were inserted one of two ways depending on which side of the pair was being built.

    Hamilton Sunstrand has changed the fixtures used to assemble the actuators so that now each gear can only be inserted one way, Valdez said.

    "We want to make sure it's mechanically impossible for it to happen again," he said.

    The company has also increased inspections and implemented digital photographing during assembly to document that the parts are configured correctly, he said.


  • #2
    Disgraceful how shoddy the workmanship is and why hasn't been picked up before. Does anyone do any work there???
    Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
    Weather nut and sad git.

    My Weather Page

    Comment


    • #3
      You can't blame the contractor for assembling something backwards that could be assembled backwards. The real problem is that they designed the Actuator to be able to be mis-assembled. NASA needs to retire the shuttle ASAP. It's not that it is unsafe or somehow flawed, but rather when was it was built, it reflected technologies that are fast-fading into the sunset or are no longer supportable. Too many engineering revisions have changed the entire character of the spacecraft, and now it is a terrible hodgepodge of 1960's-90's technology. NASA never intended the Orbiter to be around for as long as it has been.

      I've worked in the Aerospace industry. It is a weird world: the blueprints and manuals are among the most poorly written documents you're likely to ever find. Many documents are older than the people who are reading them. And the industry is painfully slow to adopt newer/innovative ways to handle paperwork and inventory.

      IMO, there is a culture problem with Aerospace industry as a whole, not just in NASA.

      I agree in concept and in spirit the idea of a reusable spaceplane, but the time for a complete revision is long past due.
      Hey, Donny! We got us a German who wants to die for his country... Oblige him. - Lt. Aldo Raine

      Comment


      • #4
        What's the line from the quasi-decent movie Armegedon?

        You know we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest bidder. Makes you feel good, doesn't it?

        Jammrock
        “Inside every sane person there’s a madman struggling to get out”
        –The Light Fantastic, Terry Pratchett

        Comment


        • #5
          Lol. Nice quote - best thing from _that_ movie..


          ~~DukeP~~

          Comment


          • #6
            I personally like the quote from Dr. Heywood Floyd in the Movie 2010 in a letter to his Wife:

            "Dear Caroline,

            Today we will be be executing a maneuver skimming the upper atmosphere of Jupiter to slow the Leonov down enough to alter our trajectory to put is in orbit around Io. It's dynamite on paper, but the people who came up with this aren't here right now."
            Hey, Donny! We got us a German who wants to die for his country... Oblige him. - Lt. Aldo Raine

            Comment

            Working...
            X