Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Videocard suggestion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Videocard suggestion

    It's sad, but after three years of honored service I feel the need to change my G400 with something a bit more powerful...

    The most important need, however, still remain video quality.
    I once tried a low cost Gefarce 2 on my PC, and spent the next two week's cleaning up my monitor.

    So:
    1) I'm oriented on an Ati
    2) I'd like to have TV-Out
    3) I have no much money, so I have to buy it used.
    4) If a new one...what about the Ati 9000?
    5) I don't need hypadupasupa power...



    And, last but not least, a rant:
    WHY THE HELL I CAN'T HAVE A MATROX CARD THAT HAS THE DOUBLE PERFORMACE OF MY G400, A FEW FEATURES MORE, THE SAME VIDEO QUALITY, WITHOUT HAVING TO SPEND 500€ FOR A PARHELIA??? O_o

    Taste my wrath, Matrox
    Sat on a pile of deads, I enjoy my oysters.

  • #2
    aspetta la seria 9100... stanno per arrivare...dovrebbero costare di meno ed essere compatibile con Dx 8 (la seria 9000 é soltanto compatibile con Dx 7)...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Wait for the 9100 series...they're arriving...they should cost less and be compatible with Dx 8 (the 9000 series is only compatible with Dx 7)...

    //unless I'm wrong of course
    Last edited by Kurt; 28 December 2002, 17:22.

    Comment


    • #3
      At the moment i would go for the ATI 9500 Pro, its not that expensive (250€), and it almost delivers 9700Pro (fastest thing right now) performance, and it is fully DX9 compatible.
      They should be available in the next couple a weeks.

      Comment


      • #4
        yup. a friend of mine bought a Rad 9000 non-pro, and he is regretting it badly. My Geforce2 GTS 64Mb is a bit faster in most games today. he thought the 128Mb would help. not really.
        The 9500 or 0500 pro is a good choice, the 9100 series being nothing other than a rebadged 8500. 0.15u part i think.
        9500 is best value, go pro if possible, you get 8 pipelines on a 128bit memory bus. for the 9500 non-pro you only get 4 pipelines on the 128bit bus. (not sure about 9500 specs now, can someone clarify?)

        stay clear of the 9000.
        PC-1 Fractal Design Arc Mini R2, 3800X, Asus B450M-PRO mATX, 2x8GB B-die@3800C16, AMD Vega64, Seasonic 850W Gold, Black Ice Nemesis/Laing DDC/EKWB 240 Loop (VRM>CPU>GPU), Noctua Fans.
        Nas : i3/itx/2x4GB/8x4TB BTRFS/Raid6 (7 + Hotspare) Xpenology
        +++ : FSP Nano 800VA (Pi's+switch) + 1600VA (PC-1+Nas)

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Kurt

          Wait for the 9100 series...they're arriving...they should cost less and be compatible with Dx 8 (the 9000 series is only compatible with Dx 7)
          What the Hell? since when is the 9000 only a Dx7 card?

          isnt the difference between the 9000 and 9100 that the 9000 has one texture unit per pipe while the 9100 is the original 8500 (LE) under a new name?
          Last edited by knirfie; 29 December 2002, 05:36.
          Main Machine: Intel Q6600@3.33, Abit IP-35 E, 4 x Geil 2048MB PC2-6400-CL4, Asus Geforce 8800GTS 512MB@700/2100, 150GB WD Raptor, Highpoint RR2640, 3x Seagate LP 1.5TB (RAID5), NEC-3500 DVD+/-R(W), Antec SLK3700BQE case, BeQuiet! DarkPower Pro 530W

          Comment


          • #6
            the 9100 is the rebadged 8500...far as I know not the LE verison

            the 9000 is cut down, cheaper verison of the 8500
            Why is it called tourist season, if we can't shoot at them?

            Comment


            • #7
              Knirfie a 9000 is like the 8500 (renamed to 9100) a directx 8.1 videocard.

              I also found a nice overview: http://www.reactorcritical.com/chips/summary-full.shtml

              The 9000 has one texture unit per pipe while the 8500 has 2.
              Main: Dual Xeon LV2.4Ghz@3.1Ghz | 3X21" | NVidia 6800 | 2Gb DDR | SCSI
              Second: Dual PIII 1GHz | 21" Monitor | G200MMS + Quadro 2 Pro | 512MB ECC SDRAM | SCSI
              Third: Apple G4 450Mhz | 21" Monitor | Radeon 8500 | 1,5Gb SDRAM | SCSI

              Comment


              • #8
                exactly like I said, the difference is 1 texture unit per pipe for the 9000 against 2 (which the 8500 had) for the 9100.

                as far is i know they're labelling both the 8500 as well as the 8500 LE as 9100's.
                Main Machine: Intel Q6600@3.33, Abit IP-35 E, 4 x Geil 2048MB PC2-6400-CL4, Asus Geforce 8800GTS 512MB@700/2100, 150GB WD Raptor, Highpoint RR2640, 3x Seagate LP 1.5TB (RAID5), NEC-3500 DVD+/-R(W), Antec SLK3700BQE case, BeQuiet! DarkPower Pro 530W

                Comment


                • #9
                  Get the fastest Radeon you can afford that has the Rage Theater chip....2d/video output quality is top notch.
                  All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by knirfie
                    What the Hell? since when is the 9000 only a Dx7 card?

                    isnt the difference between the 9000 and 9100 that the 9000 has one texture unit per pipe while the 9100 is the original 8500 (LE) under a new name?
                    yep, my bad...it's a cheaper(er) (if that's possible) 8500, thus Dx 8 compatible, while the 9000 is also Dx 8 (not Dx 7) with one less TMU/pipe (got mixed up with the GF4 MX whoops ).

                    the 9000 series is a dog, pricewise & IMHO...





                    edit: happy now?
                    Last edited by Kurt; 29 December 2002, 11:56.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Kurt
                      yep, my bad...it's a cheaper(er) (if that's possible) 8500, thus Dx 8 compatible, while the 9000 is also Dx 8 (not Dx 7) with one less pipe (got mixed up with the GF4 MX whoops ).
                      Equal pipes (4), the main difference vs the 8500/9100 is that it has 1TMU per pipe as opposed to 2.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Ok, I need a few opinions more.
                        The problem is that I want to wait for buying a Parhelia this summer, so now I can't spend too much money.
                        A new Radeon 9000 would cost only 90€, and I know I will sell it easily this summer to one of my customers for 50€.

                        Now, the question is, will the 9000 grant me let's say...50% more performance than the G400?
                        Is there anything better in about the same price tag? :-)
                        Sat on a pile of deads, I enjoy my oysters.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I dont think there officiallly really is a "9100" I think a co. is selling a clocked up 9000 as that

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            No it is a real 8500!

                            Drizzt, get a 9000pro if you can find one cheap enough.

                            And yes the 9000 offers more than 50% than the g400. It's more like 2-2,5 times faster.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by capt. marvel
                              I dont think there officiallly really is a "9100" I think a co. is selling a clocked up 9000 as that
                              They renamed the 8500 to 9100 since it is faster then the 9000/9000 pro!

                              Anyone here know if there will be 2 9100 versions available?
                              According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X