Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Parhelia Mini-Review: Watercooled Parhelia driving 3 LCD Monitors..

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Parhelia Mini-Review: Watercooled Parhelia driving 3 LCD Monitors..

    <BR><IMG SRC=http://images.prosperpoint.com/images/2540/128006-5.jpg WIDTH=396 HEIGHT=336>
    Hello all.

    I come from not only a production standpoint where stable and quiet hardware is essential but also a tweaking/overclocking/hacker standpoint and mentality which embraces the sharing of information, to never stop improving, to fix what isn't fixable (and likewise to break isn't broken), to be smart enough to surround oneself with people smarter than oneself, etc. So, here's my Parhelia story:

    I do audio production work by trade and run many PC setups that are noiseless and watercooled utilizing two types of videocard arrangements to run Three 18" LCD monitors per PC via DVI (digital) connection. Several PCs use: Matrox G550 Dual-DVI AGP card + Matrox G450 PCI Single-DVI card, and several other PCs use: Nvidia NVS 200 Dual-DVI AGP card + Nvidia GeForce2 MX400 PCI Single-DVI card. The nvidia combination is slightly faster than Matrox combo running on identical mobo/cpu/mem/hardware (because they're just newer product offerings Nvidia is addressing to Matrox's existing market). These systems work great with no fans on any heatsinks due to noise-free requirements. The only downside to running a video card on the PCI bus (the second graphics card in each system to drive 3rd monitor) is that any display/windowing activity on the monitor driven by this card can at times flood the PCI bus all the way to 85% of the bus's bandwidth limit in short bursts. This has the effect of causing occasional dropouts on timing-sensitive PCI-based pro audio cards. A hardware-based PCI bus monitor card (RC2 Geiger) was used to verify the behavior of the PCI DVI video cards in initial testing to support the onscreen "real-life use" phenomenon of often sluggish video on the display that the PCI video card drives. In addition, when there is a lot of audio card activity, the PCI video card produces a sluggish display due to these high-bandwidth cards fighting over the PCI bus.

    These particular multi-graphic card combinations were boiled down from testing of dozens of combinations from just about every multi-monitor card manufacturer, including some high-end workstation cards. Never satisfied, I'm always open to improving things one more step, and have been waiting on one of the major manufacturers players to overcome the technical problems associated with driving more than 2 monitors via the AGP interface (nvidia continues to toil away at it - crossbar memory architecture snafus, blah blah, no need to get into details here, and given that the upcoming Matrox G450 MMS cards don't offer an AGP flavor that provides more than 2 DVI displays, perhaps they're having problems as well).

    So, I finally purchased a Parhelia Retail version last week after reading many reviews and deciding that the ability to run my three monitors on a single AGP card and (consequently) without touching the PCI bus was the dealmaker. I wasn't thrilled about the fact that I would have to run 2 of the 3 flat-screen monitors via analog when in Triplehead mode, having "seen the light" and sheer magnificence of a flatpanel thru DVI, but at least the analog outputs of the DACs on the P are the best in the industry (conversion from digital to analog on the card, then analog back to digital on the lcd monitor is a terrible shame in video just as in audio).

    Initial tests: The 2D application performance of the P in triple-head mode is *lightning* fast, in fact FASTER than any combination of Dual-DVI AGP card + PCI DVI card we ever tested. Besides standard Sysmark/Sandra benchmarks and things, just the smoothness and quickness of things like minimizing/maximizing windows (or testing the blink rate of desktop-show by holding down WindowsKey-D for example) and watching all three screens behave identically is a joy (no traditional "crippled secondary display" here).

    After a day's testing of the card within a typical day's workflow, my colleagues and I were hooked - all the applications just plain "felt" smoother given that a lot of window and desktop switching goes on in the audio apps we use (and one less 'troubled child' on the PCI bus to boot with the absence of a PCI video card for the 3rd display).

    Next thing: For permanent installation the whiny fan on the heatsink had to go, given it was the only thing producing noise in the test system. Keep in mind that its fine for most peoples' tastes when it wouldn't be heard over case fans and CPU fans anyway. I noticed the main chip runs VERY hot upon initial tests. A quick trip into the freezer in a plastic ziploc bag and 20 minutes later the heatsink's adhesive was brittle enough to remove. After using some "Goof-off" (Xylene-based chemical) the thermal wax was cleaned from the P's heatspreader, after which Arctic Silver thermal adhesive was applied, followed by slapping on the Innovatek GPU waterblock: the Parhelia was now officially watercooled! Ofcourse the mem chips run hot but I won't worry about them for now since we don't really plan on overclocking the card for gaming. Another noise-free solution for quiet-computing fans might be the upcoming fanless (noiseless) Zalman heatpipe-based copper GPU heatsink.

    Though the P may be on the expensive side when I extrapolate its cost across building many more audio workstation PC's utilizing it for other studios, and since all its really being used for is fast triple-monitoring without bothering the PCI bus and only used for occasional gaming, I suppose its still worth the price given no other manufacturer does more than 2 displays via AGP. Yes, there IS a noticable difference in sharpness when A/B comparing between the DVI and Analog outputs of the P on an Eizo L685 18" LCD (utilizing this monitor's dual-inputs for fast A/B switching), and granted you have to put your face up to the screen to see, so I guess its quite passable in normal use. I do realize that its probably the best analog output that any card can deliver right now for the price range.

    So, bottom line for me is an 8 out of 10 rating. It loses points for the fact that it would've been more professional for matrox to include a larger/denser heatsink combined with a larger slower-spinning fan to bring the noise down. Second, the inability to run all three monitors via DVI is a disappointment, as well as for the inability to run separate desktops with three monitors to enable monitor pivoting software because triplehead mode combines displays into one giant desktop as windows sees it, which makes pivoting software useless. Portrait mode really is much more like one giant screen because there's 33% less eye-travel horizontally - you ought to try it sometime. For now we'll live without portrait mode on new setups built around Parhelia, because faster screen responsiveness and a PCI bus left free for the audio cards was voted as more important by myself and the other testers.

    If a future incarnation of the P supports triple-DVI via Matrox's LFH connector replacing one of the current two DVI outs on the PCB, you can be sure we'll be getting them. Perhaps a future driver refresh will allow separate desktops for each of the three monitors to allow for portrait mode orientation.

    Regards,

    Joe T.
    Last edited by testjoe; 22 August 2002, 09:27.

  • #2
    interesting, Do you think a crystal orb would fit on a Parhelia ?

    here a quote from the news post on the inquirer:


    "The Taiwanese manufacturer also claimed that towards the end of the year we'll see cards overclocked to billy-o, which might really give Matrox competitors a run for their money."


    and here real world benchmarks from the ATI 9700
    GameSpot is the world's largest source for PS4, Xbox One, PS3, Xbox 360, Wii U, PS Vita, Wii PC, 3DS, PSP, DS, video game news, reviews, previews, trailers, walkthroughs, and more.


    "...Alienware system as it shipped to us, with the Radeon 9700"

    its not as fast anymore


    Last edited by CaineTanathos; 18 August 2002, 07:11.
    Hey! You're talking to me all wrong! It's the wrong tone! Do it again...and I'll stab you in the face with a soldering iron

    Comment


    • #3
      Does the phrase "CPU limited" means anything to you?

      Do you actually read between the lines (i.e. use the gray matter between your ears and interpret what those tests are trying to do, or do you just see the pretty pictures with nice bars? Yeah, I know it's easier to just use pretty pics to sell stuff...that's how I get nice fat budgets for my projects from my bosses - just use powerpoint. )

      Turn up the res to 1600x1200, turn up the goodies (ani, fsaa, etc). Then tell me again the R9700 is not as fast anymore. Especially compared to the same priced US$399 Parhelia.

      and here real world benchmarks from the ATI 9700
      GameSpot is the world's largest source for PS4, Xbox One, PS3, Xbox 360, Wii U, PS Vita, Wii PC, 3DS, PSP, DS, video game news, reviews, previews, trailers, walkthroughs, and more.


      "...Alienware system as it shipped to us, with the Radeon 9700"

      its not as fast anymore


      [/B][/QUOTE]
      Last edited by blacklotus; 18 August 2002, 09:01.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by CaineTanathos
        interesting, Do you think a crystal orb would fit on a Parhelia ?
        No...it's too small. It won't even cover the whole chip.
        Core2 Duo E7500 2.93, Asus P5Q Pro Turbo, 4gig 1066 DDR2, 1gig Asus ENGTS250, SB X-Fi Gamer ,WD Caviar Black 1tb, Plextor PX-880SA, Dual Samsung 2494s

        Comment


        • #5
          Does anyone know when the Zalman Heatpipe heatsink mentioned in the original post will be available?

          Comment


          • #6
            Zalman Heatpipe availability...

            Troy:

            I happen to have the answer on availability straight from the Zalman U.S. distributor's mouth as of a few days ago, coincidentally, since I'm looking to pick up a few of those for some testing myself for the Parhelia and a few other cards and non-GPU applications. As well, given that the 'large' version of the three versions that appear to be coming out (small/medium/large) of this particular fanless heatsink, that Zalman states "The test result from ZALMAN's lab shows that it can cover geForce4 Ti series without a problem" I imagine that it'll handle a Parhelia as well. I do plan on testing additional Parhelias when we purchase with the large Zalman heatpipe heatsink.


            Joe T.


            ----Original Reply from Zalman USA, re: zalman heatpipe--------

            Dear Joe,

            In our schedule, it will be released 23rd of this month.
            It will be available in the US market in the middle of September.

            Thank you and best regards,

            Don Cho
            VP of Zalman USA, Inc.
            Last edited by testjoe; 18 August 2002, 14:42.

            Comment


            • #7
              Testjoe, how can you claim that the HS on Parhelia is loud and ineffective?

              If yours was loud then it was defective and should have been replaced.

              Effective means it does the job it was designed todo. It does it's intended job, so how can you claim it's cheap crap?

              Then there is another point you made about the GPU being near ambient... I'd like to hear how you measured this.

              Proper removal of Parhelia's HS isn't by cooling it but rather a quick one minute heating with a hair drier and it pops right off. We mentioned this ~2 months ago.

              Additionally since the thermal wax compound was specifically choosen to work as an integral part of Parhelia's cooling system (as above) be crap? AS Epoxy permanently bonds to the GPU, so if your card ever fails you not only voided your warranty, but will have a real fun time in removing the waterjacket or take that as an additional loss.

              BTW This isn't a flame, I like what you have done (for the most part).
              "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

              "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Greebe
                ... Then there is another point you made about the GPU being near ambient... I'd like to hear how you measured this....
                Notice that he described the temperature probe placement in the photo he edited into his post.
                <TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>

                Comment


                • #9
                  ahhh... missed that the first time around.

                  You can then be sure that the temp is a min. of 10c higher than measured with this approach.
                  Last edited by Greebe; 18 August 2002, 20:28.
                  "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

                  "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    GREEBE:

                    > Testjoe, how can you claim that the HS on Parhelia is loud and ineffective? Effective means it does the job it was designed todo. It does it's intended job, so how can you claim it's cheap crap?

                    I stated that the factory HS is loud to MY taste, not that it was ineffective for the average consumer. My comment about replacing it was for anyone considering _overclocking_ it in the future if you look. Granted, I work in soundproof acoustically-sensitive rooms both at work & home alike, and high scrutiny is given to the introduction of any new equipment into the production environment, so the average fan's whisper is perhaps my scream. To most people I'm perhaps splitting hairs. Notwithstanding, I know you know I'm not the first and won't be the last speaking of this loud fan issue on MURC, Matrox Forums and elsewhere since I've already seen many. All that said, no my fan isn't defective, as it makes db noise levels expected of a fan of its size and rotational speed. As you know, the smaller the fan, faster the rotation and closer to the obstruction of intake and/or exhaust, the louder. My point was mainly that for a $400 card, I feel like the heatsink could've been more than the type that also ships on a $25 econo vga card. Average just for the sake of saving a few pennies seemed illogical given its Matrox's new baby with so much scrutiny paid in all other areas. Perhaps a larger, denser piece of metal with a larger fan at a slower rotational speed would've been nicer for the buyer's $400.

                    >Proper removal of Parhelia's HS isn't by cooling it but rather a quick one minute heating with a hair drier and it pops right off. We mentioned this ~2 months ago. Additionally since the thermal wax compound was specifically choosen to work as an integral part of Parhelia's cooling system (as above) be crap? AS Epoxy permanently bonds to the GPU, so if your card ever fails you not only voided your warranty, but will have a real fun time in removing the waterjacket or take that as an additional loss.

                    Well, I only recently joined the P bandwagon, and doing things myself in life without waiting around for tech support to get back from lunch (so to speak) is how problems get generally solved faster. I didn't know what specific heat transfer catalyst was underneath and in my experience cooling down works better than heating for removal of MOST glued heatsinks. The fact that I saw the wax as sloppy and inconsistent when the heatsink was removed doesn't mean it doesn't do its job 'well enough' - it just meant that it was uneven and inconsistent but comensurate with the "good enough" heatsink its partnered with. A useless exaggeration perhaps to most people.

                    > BTW This isn't a flame, I like what you have done (for the most part).

                    No flame taken - pi$$ing contests on internet are a waste of precious time anyway and are only symptomatic of the fragility of the arguers' egoes. As far as the voided warranty issue, the flipside of warranty paranoia is nothing ventured/nothing gained. My P in its current state is easily returned to the way it was from the factory, but I don't expect to ever bother Matrox with it anyway since once it works for 24 hours it will work until its outlived its technically useful lifetime. Likewise if I blow it up I take responsibility. I understand both sides of the fence and would be the last person crying to tech support if the worst happened. I've found that one can't rely on most manufacturers anyway even when one stays within warranty guidelines, so I generally just take things into my own hands anyway.

                    Bottom line: We're on the same side, and my post was only meant to point out MY particular experience in quieting the thing down, and NOT meant to say "look mine's better than yours" or "matrox sucks" or be politically correct, unexaggerated, or even scientific. Brand-based zealotry is best left to feuding compu-teens in IRC and forums with time to kill that don't have jobs that make it clear that the best brand is whatever one is the best tool for a particular job/task. I purposely didn't bother with more scientific details than I already did (i.e. ambient room temps, more details about cooling system, methodology, etc). because it just didn't matter to me since my issue was silencing the P and I was only sharing my experience. I'm totally aware that testing the edge of a heat spreader rather than the P's actual slug or an internal diode's reading (if such a diode exists and we get access to it in a software tool in the future) isn't exactly scientific. My first post didn't even mention temps or even a picture and then I got bombarded with emails for requests of pics and temps and all sorts of other scientific and benchmark data and so I updated it and elaborated a bit more with a pic and more explanation just to share with the community.

                    The Parhelia is a fabulous card that is even better with an easy tweak to the heatsink for overclocker hopefuls and/or quiet-computing fans and I hope for mine and everyone elses' sake that the Parhelia's future is as bright as it can be if Matrox makes intelligent moves in the future and embraces its customer base just a little more.

                    Take Care,

                    J.T.
                    Last edited by testjoe; 18 August 2002, 23:50.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      testjoe,

                      Just out of curiosity:
                      You mentioned Portrait mode desktops. What kind of software do you use that looks so nice in portrait ?
                      Usually software is designed by default for Landscape so if you resize it to a portrait, you'll get pretty much dead space in the bottom.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        TestJoe awesome mini-review, you'll have to forgive Greebe..he's just a bit of a Matrox zealot.
                        Celeron 566@877 1.8V, 256meg generic PC-100 RAM (running at CAS2) Abit BH6, G400 16meg DH@150/200, Western Digital Expert 18gig, Ricoh mp7040A(morphed to mp7060A) Pioneer 6X DVD slot load, Motorola Cable Modem w/DEC ethernet card, Soundblaster Live Value Ver. 2, Viewsonic GT 775

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Maniac
                          TestJoe awesome mini-review, you'll have to forgive Greebe..he's just a bit of a Matrox zealot.
                          A bit?!? A BIT!?!?




                          Hrhr

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Rimfaxe


                            A bit?!? A BIT!?!?




                            Hrhr
                            Hey, don't be insulting, we all know Abit makes shit mobos.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Bitte ein Bit?

                              AZ
                              There's an Opera in my macbook.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X