Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Parhelia Single vs Triple Benchmarks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Parhelia Single vs Triple Benchmarks



    C:\DOS
    C:\DOS\RUN
    \RUN\DOS\RUN

  • #2
    Oh boy just what we need another fps kiddie showing off his Q3 benches

    moron is only running 256 megs too
    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

    "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

    Comment


    • #3
      Why the hell is it only showing it as a single display res when its running at 1024x768 its really 3072x768 in surround gamming mode???

      Edit: Yet some fodder for [h] to put up....its on their front page
      Last edited by GT98; 15 August 2002, 09:57.
      Why is it called tourist season, if we can't shoot at them?

      Comment


      • #4
        What did he excpect?

        If the card didn't run each screen 66% slower compared to single head then I'd have to ask why single head was so slow!
        Last edited by UberLord; 15 August 2002, 10:05.
        "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen Roberts

        µße®LørÐ - A legend in his underwear
        Member of For F*ck Sake UT clan
        DriverHeaven administrator
        PowerVR Network administrator

        Comment


        • #5
          I found the problem : Windows XP Pro (Korean)

          Just kidding

          I agree with greebe, mr Moron only use 256 DDR...
          another thing, wait for next drivers, or next next drivers

          I am sure performance will improve
          Hey! You're talking to me all wrong! It's the wrong tone! Do it again...and I'll stab you in the face with a soldering iron

          Comment


          • #6
            Assuming 16xFAA and all other quality thingys are at max, 2400x600 @ 72,1FPS doesn't seem bad, or does it?
            Join MURCs Distributed Computing effort for Rosetta@Home and help fight Alzheimers, Cancer, Mad Cow disease and rising oil prices.
            [...]the pervading principle and abiding test of good breeding is the requirement of a substantial and patent waste of time. - Veblen

            Comment


            • #7
              Actually it says on the site linked above that 16xFAA and anisotropic filtering were disabled in the driver settings. So sad, I really would like to see the performance hit with everything at max.

              Comment

              Working...
              X