Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My test of the Phillips DVCR-985

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • My test of the Phillips DVCR-985

    Executive summary:

    If you want to convert tapes to DVD buy this unit, unless your tapes have macrovison.

    If you want to record TV shows and you have a DVD player compatible with DVD+RW by this unit.

    Otherwise forget about it.



    The quality of the real-time mpeg2 encoding is great, no complaiants there. It appears to record AC3 audio based on DVD+R recording played back on our Zenith 2381 with external SDIF attached 5.1 sound system (obviously this is stereo converted to some 5.1 format variation, but it does sound good). Unfortunately I'm done saying good things about it.

    DVD+RW compatibility appears as bad as with the HP DVD100i I tried back in October. DVD+R so far plays glitch free in the three players tested so far, two of which glitch on DVD-R.

    The menu/chapter creation is a real PITA, the results look terrible, force you to disclose you used a DVCR to make the disks, and there appears to be no way to get rid of the default "Empty Title" selection unless you completely fill up a disk.

    My hopes of authoring a DVD+RW, tediously splitting it into "titles" that show as menu selections, and running off copies, were quickly dashed by two major problems. Splitting a DVD+RW recording results in a 1-2 sec "freeze frame" and audio mute at the split point. You could record your DV as one recording per title as a workaround or if you have only static titles with no audio as the only menu selections this would be OK.

    For ~$1000 I want to ease my workflow, not spend more time babysitting a recorder while converting DV to mpeg. Bad as this is, the real showstopper for me is after tediously authoring a DVD+RW and verifying it played correctly in my Sony NS315 (the only one I have at present that does DVD+RW glitch free) I tried to copy the result to DVD+R with Nero 5.5.9.0 using an Ikebana external 1394 DVD+RW/R burner. Copying the VIDEO_TS folder to my hard drive was as expected, but when I added the files to Nero'd "DVD Video" template and tried to burn it aborted with: "relocation of video files failed".

    I've exceeed my threshold of pain that I'm willing to put up with to try and make an ~$1000 device be somehow worth it to me. I'll be returning it tomorrow.

    --wally.
    Last edited by wkulecz; 8 July 2002, 06:44.

  • #2
    I recommend neither unit for people who want to produce DVD discs that play in the vast majority of computer DVD-ROM drives.


    If all you are wanting is playback in stand alone players, then the Panasonic DMR-E20 is a better buy, in my opinion, UNLESS you absolutely must have a Firewire connection.


    The Panasonic DMR-E20's picture is stellar when you record from the S-Video output of a digital camcorder.


    It's also much less expensive than the Philips unit - yet offers the option of DVD-RAM recording in addition to DVD-R recording.


    DVD-RAM is superb because of its ease of re-writing and editing.


    The Panasonic DMR-E20 DVD-R discs played in every stand alone player we tested.


    So did the Philips DVD+R disc.


    But both produced DVD discs that failed to play in our computer DVD-ROM drives.


    If you want compatibility with the widest array of playback devices, I would recommend the Pioneer DVR-7000.


    The DVD-R produced by the Pioneer played even in our most finnicky DVD-ROM drive.


    Jerry Jones

    I found a great domain name for sale on Dan.com. Check it out!

    Comment

    Working...
    X