Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Question on OS booting.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Question on OS booting.

    Howdy all. I have Win2k installed on my secondary drive, G. I did this because my C drive is on it's last leg. If I disconnect the C drive though, the Win2k install on G won't boot. I tried copying over the system files and the boot.ini file, but it still won't boot. Is there any good way to make G pull it's head out of it's butt and become C happily, or am I going to need to reinstall?

  • #2
    Have you used the sys-command to transfer systemfiles ?
    Perhaps the rescue-disks might be of help ?

    Also, you could try to replace the C-drive with a new drive, and make this the bootdrive by using the command "sys c:" (I'm not sure if it will work though)

    I remember my NT4 on installed on E: in my previous system (3 harddisks : C D E). When removing the D-drive, NT booted happily from its disk (which now was called D), but most applications didn't adapt to this change very well. So bear in mind that - although W2K might be able to deal with it - installed applications might not...


    Personally, I'd think reinstalling W2K is the best way to go (if you intend to have drive-letters shifted around).

    Jörg
    pixar
    Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow. (James Dean)

    Comment


    • #3
      you have to add a boot record to the G drive.
      ..so it can start the boot process.

      in win 98 etc, you coulkd do it with

      fdisk /mbr

      I don't now how its done with win2k, may be possible using the repair console from the win2k cdrom, or rescue disk.

      Comment


      • #4
        See I forgot all about the MBR. I'll give that a go this afternoon, if that doesn't work the Win2k repair is the next step I think.

        Comment


        • #5
          Yes, the master boot record is the key here.

          But remeber if you have your G: as NTFS you have trouble, because windows wants a fat partition for the mbr.


          Heh, I remember one of my friends once installed w2k to e: or whatever it was, he absoulutely wanted the w2k to be c:, he tried a lot of different things with ending up with an re-install of the whole sytem...

          Just a thought.
          My system:
          | Athlon XP2600+ 2,4GHz@200FSB| Water Cooled Processor | Samsung 2x256MB PC3200 Ram (400MHz) | Epox 8RDA mb | Hercules FDX Radeon 8500 LE 128MB | Abit Hot Rod DMA/100 RAID controller | 2*20GB IBM and Western 10.2GB @RAID controller | Soundblaster 5.1 Audigy Player | Actima 6x/32x DVD-ROM, Samsung 12x/8x/32x CDRW | Logitech Force Feedback wheel | Microsoft Sidewinder Force Feedback 2 Joystick | 550W water-cooled Q-TEC PSU | 278/278 kbit DSL internet connection | Windows 2000 Pro | My Homepage
          homemade watercooling in use,Pics on the homepage...

          no more VIA, no more!

          Comment


          • #6
            Not entirely true...

            Windows 2000 is perfectly capable of running/booting on an all NTFS system. Windows NT was even capable of running/booting on such a system.

            The problem occurs when installing NT on a system that has not FAT-partitions : it needs FAT for its temporary files. I'm not sure about W2K however, but booting from an NTFS is no problem (see screenshot, the unknown partitions are a linux partition and a linux swap partition).


            Jörg
            Attached Files
            pixar
            Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow. (James Dean)

            Comment


            • #7
              You can also use Partiton Magic to change drive letters without problems.

              But as stated fdisk /mbr will do the trick.

              Or if you can get a hold of a Win XP CD-ROM you can boot from that and then start the recovery console where there are two commands called FIXBOOT and FIXMBR ( or something like that)

              (I don't know if WIN XP can mount W2K .....)
              Fear, Makes Wise Men Foolish !
              incentivize transparent paradigms

              Comment

              Working...
              X