Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is this true (XP)?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is this true (XP)?

    Can anyone confirm <a href="http://www.xp-refresh.net/" target="_blank">this?</a>

    I thought the refresh problems was a "feature" of Ati:s drivers.
    (Solved using 3rd party RefreshFix).

    rubank

  • #2
    Dunno haven't played games under XP. I had the desktop/games under win2k/98 stuck at 60hz due to bugs in the ATI driver inf file which a slight edit cured.
    I haven't seen anyone here complaining about it so based on that I'd say it isn't true.
    Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
    Weather nut and sad git.

    My Weather Page

    Comment


    • #3
      Confirmed!

      I just tested it and it seems to be true.

      Test Bed:
      Windows XP Pro
      G400Max
      MAG XJ796

      Direct3D: 75hz
      OpenGL: 60hz
      Normal windows R/R: 85hz

      Took me by surprise too.

      Chen

      Comment


      • #4
        It is true, but actually it's simply a slight change in the API that game manufacturers have failed to deal with.

        In Win9x, the "default" refresh rate is the highest your monitor supports. Problem is that oftentimes that refresh rate doesn't display properly, because people don't set those rates up.

        Solution? Make the "default" refresh rate the LOWEST your monitor supports. You want it higher? Set it higher!

        Problem? 90% of games ONLY support the "default" refresh rate.

        So, it's MS's fault for not publicizing this API change, but it's also the game companies' fault for not making their games configurable.

        CIV3 users complained so loudly that the CIV team put a refresh option into the .ini file. At the same time they released a press statement saying "we added it, but we don't know WHY you'd EVER want to use it..."

        Quake Engine, Infinity Engine, and other games have long had a refresh rate option in the .ini file, however poorly documented it might be.

        *shrug*

        It's just another innovation that people will have to deal with. Used to be people complained because the "default" color depth was 256 and the game couldn't select 16-bit...

        - Gurm
        The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!

        I'm the least you could do
        If only life were as easy as you
        I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
        If only life were as easy as you
        I would still get screwed

        Comment


        • #5
          What about things like MechWarrior4? I don't know of any way to set the refresh rate in that, and you'd think MS's own games would have this resolved.
          Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

          Comment


          • #6
            Yeah whatever. MS doesn't really write its games.

            - Gurm
            The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!

            I'm the least you could do
            If only life were as easy as you
            I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
            If only life were as easy as you
            I would still get screwed

            Comment


            • #7
              It is true.

              Under NT/2000/XP, refresh rates are enumerated through the API rather than the registry, and applications that want to change display settings ask Windows what refresh rates are available. When a game designed for Windows 9x tells Windows it wants a resolution and color depth, without specifying a refresh rate, Windows defaults to the first refresh rate returned by the display driver and that's 60Hz.

              NT4/Win2000/WinXP, they all have the same issue.

              ... every time you switch resolutions in XP, you have to manually change your refresh rate setting to the highest available to get the best display quality possible on the 2D desktop.
              This is a WinXP only issue.
              Main: Dual Xeon LV2.4Ghz@3.1Ghz | 3X21" | NVidia 6800 | 2Gb DDR | SCSI
              Second: Dual PIII 1GHz | 21" Monitor | G200MMS + Quadro 2 Pro | 512MB ECC SDRAM | SCSI
              Third: Apple G4 450Mhz | 21" Monitor | Radeon 8500 | 1,5Gb SDRAM | SCSI

              Comment


              • #8
                Now thats why I use 98 as my gaming machine and win2k as the server and work machines.
                Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
                Weather nut and sad git.

                My Weather Page

                Comment


                • #9
                  It's not a problem if you set up your refresh rates using the advanced settings' Monitor settings tab with Matrox drivers

                  Rags

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    ... and save this display profile for the next time you upgrade drivers or what not.

                    Note I've found that you must manually change each refresh rate by hand and save it. Otherwise the default reports it incorrect and instead of getting say 85 you end up with 60 or 75.

                    M$



                    ... don't mention disabling Vsync ...
                    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

                    "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      For nVIDIA reference driver users, which have no / little monitor adjustment options, there is a small freeware program out wich is called RefreshLock !

                      It runs in the tray and sets the refhresh rates of your choiche whenever the resolution changes !


                      And it works just great ... it's for NT, 2K and XP !

                      RefreshLock Homepage

                      I have been using it for a while now and have had no problems with it so far.
                      Fear, Makes Wise Men Foolish !
                      incentivize transparent paradigms

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        According to my settings in XP i am running my IIyama monitor at 200hz @1024x768.

                        Now either i have the most remarkable SMT900 monitor or XP is talking crap. Any opinions?

                        edit: the monitor reports 99.9hz. hmm, xp lie to me, it bad.
                        1st system

                        Athlon AXIA Y 1Ghz @ 1.40Ghz, coolermaster hsf, Elite K7s6a, 512 MB Crucial DDR RAM, 20GB IBM 7200RPM Hard drive, Radeon 8500le 64mb, SB Audigy, 3 com 10/100NIC, 300w PSU, midi tower, FPS 1600 Surround, Belinea 17" monitor, Intellimouse explorer USB

                        System 2

                        Athlon TB 1.4 @ 1.5, Zalman Flower in silent mode, Elite K7S6A, 768MB DDRAM, Ati Radeon 8500le 64mb ddr, SB Audigy, 3Com 10/100NIC, 80GB IBM 7200rpm, Liteon 16 speed DVD, Lite-on 24102b CDRW, Songcheer Superwide, USB scanner, Intellimouse explorer, Microsoft keyboard, 19in iiyama Monitor, FPS1600

                        system 3
                        Abit ST6 RAID, Celly 1.2 @1.4 ,512MB SDRAM, Zalman Flower HSF noisey mode, ATi Radeon 8500le, SBLIVE, 3com 10/100 NIC, 80GB Seagate barracude HDD, 40GB IBM120GXP, 60GB IBM60GXP,Extra highpoint controller card, 16x Pioneer DVD, Pioneer DVR-104 DVD-RW, ATX Full tower case. 300w psu, 17in LG monitor, 20in Samsumg telly, epson stylus colour 880, 200W RMS Surround sound amp with Mission M71 Speakers.
                        .

                        System 4
                        Elite K7S5A, Duron 1.0, 128mb sdram, Coolermaster hsf, 80GB 120GXP IBM, Liteon 16x DVD, Radeon 7200 64MB DDR, SBLIVE.

                        Linksys 4 port router/firewall

                        512k Cable modem. nice

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Your monitor .inf is probably either not installed or wrong.

                          - Gurm
                          The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!

                          I'm the least you could do
                          If only life were as easy as you
                          I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
                          If only life were as easy as you
                          I would still get screwed

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            when i do install the inf file it wont allow me to go higher than 85hz so i leave it off. I am using the default monitor inf. Strange that it lets me alter the rates below 100hz but above it does nothing. I am pretty sure that 100hz is top whack for this monitor anyway so it doesnt really matter. It would be nice if it said what it really was though.
                            1st system

                            Athlon AXIA Y 1Ghz @ 1.40Ghz, coolermaster hsf, Elite K7s6a, 512 MB Crucial DDR RAM, 20GB IBM 7200RPM Hard drive, Radeon 8500le 64mb, SB Audigy, 3 com 10/100NIC, 300w PSU, midi tower, FPS 1600 Surround, Belinea 17" monitor, Intellimouse explorer USB

                            System 2

                            Athlon TB 1.4 @ 1.5, Zalman Flower in silent mode, Elite K7S6A, 768MB DDRAM, Ati Radeon 8500le 64mb ddr, SB Audigy, 3Com 10/100NIC, 80GB IBM 7200rpm, Liteon 16 speed DVD, Lite-on 24102b CDRW, Songcheer Superwide, USB scanner, Intellimouse explorer, Microsoft keyboard, 19in iiyama Monitor, FPS1600

                            system 3
                            Abit ST6 RAID, Celly 1.2 @1.4 ,512MB SDRAM, Zalman Flower HSF noisey mode, ATi Radeon 8500le, SBLIVE, 3com 10/100 NIC, 80GB Seagate barracude HDD, 40GB IBM120GXP, 60GB IBM60GXP,Extra highpoint controller card, 16x Pioneer DVD, Pioneer DVR-104 DVD-RW, ATX Full tower case. 300w psu, 17in LG monitor, 20in Samsumg telly, epson stylus colour 880, 200W RMS Surround sound amp with Mission M71 Speakers.
                            .

                            System 4
                            Elite K7S5A, Duron 1.0, 128mb sdram, Coolermaster hsf, 80GB 120GXP IBM, Liteon 16x DVD, Radeon 7200 64MB DDR, SBLIVE.

                            Linksys 4 port router/firewall

                            512k Cable modem. nice

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Birdy by default ATI disable the monitors inf and use they own predefined settings which is why I get stuck at 60hz (Desktop)under win2k/98/xp. It also means that any other setting other than adaptor default doesn't work.
                              The easy solution is to use the Omegadrivers that fix this problem you've also reminded me that I've forgotten which key in the registry/inf I need to edit to fix this. Forgot to mention if you use your monitor info key you'll get the real information.
                              Last edited by The PIT; 12 April 2002, 11:03.
                              Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
                              Weather nut and sad git.

                              My Weather Page

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X