Tweet
But could this be something of the past?
Will this mark the end of? (Oh, I dear not to say)
Here is and little extraction of the article, for the full article go here: http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardwa...00/default.asp
Virtually all GeForce2 and 3 owners are satisfied with their video card's speed, but at the same time, virtually all of them complain about 2D visual quality. It's a known fact that NVIDIA based cards don't have quite the sharp image that can be seen on a Matrox product, or the chromatic visual exuberance of an ATI card.
Leadtek set out to rise above the rest by scrutinizing the components on its boards. Making sure that any components on its GeForce3 boards meet critical standards, the final result is a GeForce3 Ti product boasting image quality exceeding those of famous Matrox products
We were rather hesitant to do a review on a single GeForce3 Ti 500 board but Leadtek gives us razor sharp images that put even Matrox cards to shame. This is something that we couldn't ignore and frankly, the image quality on the WinFast Ti 500 still amazes us even after weeks of usage.
Razor visuals
When video cards are set at higher resolutions, the video signal becomes progressively weaker. This is because at high res, the RAMDAC (RAM digital to analog converter) must draw more lines to fill the screen. Each line on the monitor receives a limited amount of time spent, and with more lines to draw, less time is spent on each line. Besides the time split, signal strength is also reduced and each graphic line on your monitor has a weaker signal at high resolutions. Most people who witness this don't have the benefit of having another video card on-hand to compare, and misdiagnose the problem as a failing/inadequate monitor.
To keep images sharp when scaling to high resolutions, the output circuitry on the video card must be able to compensate the increased number of draw lines by stabilizing output power. Before the WinFast GeForce3 TDH, no other NVIDIA based card on the market - with the exception of the Canopus X20 (available only in Japan) - used high-quality filter components. The lackluster filters that are used on most NVIDIA cards degraded the overall image from the GPU.
Image quality is one of the primary reasons why a company like Matrox chooses to manufacture its own boards. By doing so, Matrox can control the quality of components used on its products because it purchases them itself. While being a chip maker does give NVIDIA advantages, it limits NVIDIA's ability to keep a high level of quality control. NVIDIA will define what components to use on its products but board manufactures are not always interested in quality before bottom line.
During our tests with a Matrox G450, G550, ATI Radeon VE, Radeon All-in-Wonder, the WinFast Ti 500 showed better image consistency than any other card. While the Matrox cards were already displayed razor sharp text, the WinFast slightly passed it in terms of resolution scaling. At 1600x1200x85Hz, lines and text on the WinFast Ti 500 exhibited no noticeable ghosting or blur while the G550 showed very faint signs of edge blurriness.
Leadtek will be using high-quality filters for all of its future graphics boards starting with the WinFast GeForce3 TDH. We sure hope that other board manufacturers realize that although games are wonderful to play, most users still spend the majority of their computing time in Windows.
It's important to note that the quality of the monitor is still an important determinant in visual quality. You can have the sharpest video card on the planet, but hook it up to an old VGA monitor, and the signal won't be any better than what you'd get with an old ISA adapter.
Will this mark the end of? (Oh, I dear not to say)
Here is and little extraction of the article, for the full article go here: http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardwa...00/default.asp
Virtually all GeForce2 and 3 owners are satisfied with their video card's speed, but at the same time, virtually all of them complain about 2D visual quality. It's a known fact that NVIDIA based cards don't have quite the sharp image that can be seen on a Matrox product, or the chromatic visual exuberance of an ATI card.
Leadtek set out to rise above the rest by scrutinizing the components on its boards. Making sure that any components on its GeForce3 boards meet critical standards, the final result is a GeForce3 Ti product boasting image quality exceeding those of famous Matrox products
We were rather hesitant to do a review on a single GeForce3 Ti 500 board but Leadtek gives us razor sharp images that put even Matrox cards to shame. This is something that we couldn't ignore and frankly, the image quality on the WinFast Ti 500 still amazes us even after weeks of usage.
Razor visuals
When video cards are set at higher resolutions, the video signal becomes progressively weaker. This is because at high res, the RAMDAC (RAM digital to analog converter) must draw more lines to fill the screen. Each line on the monitor receives a limited amount of time spent, and with more lines to draw, less time is spent on each line. Besides the time split, signal strength is also reduced and each graphic line on your monitor has a weaker signal at high resolutions. Most people who witness this don't have the benefit of having another video card on-hand to compare, and misdiagnose the problem as a failing/inadequate monitor.
To keep images sharp when scaling to high resolutions, the output circuitry on the video card must be able to compensate the increased number of draw lines by stabilizing output power. Before the WinFast GeForce3 TDH, no other NVIDIA based card on the market - with the exception of the Canopus X20 (available only in Japan) - used high-quality filter components. The lackluster filters that are used on most NVIDIA cards degraded the overall image from the GPU.
Image quality is one of the primary reasons why a company like Matrox chooses to manufacture its own boards. By doing so, Matrox can control the quality of components used on its products because it purchases them itself. While being a chip maker does give NVIDIA advantages, it limits NVIDIA's ability to keep a high level of quality control. NVIDIA will define what components to use on its products but board manufactures are not always interested in quality before bottom line.
During our tests with a Matrox G450, G550, ATI Radeon VE, Radeon All-in-Wonder, the WinFast Ti 500 showed better image consistency than any other card. While the Matrox cards were already displayed razor sharp text, the WinFast slightly passed it in terms of resolution scaling. At 1600x1200x85Hz, lines and text on the WinFast Ti 500 exhibited no noticeable ghosting or blur while the G550 showed very faint signs of edge blurriness.
Leadtek will be using high-quality filters for all of its future graphics boards starting with the WinFast GeForce3 TDH. We sure hope that other board manufacturers realize that although games are wonderful to play, most users still spend the majority of their computing time in Windows.
It's important to note that the quality of the monitor is still an important determinant in visual quality. You can have the sharpest video card on the planet, but hook it up to an old VGA monitor, and the signal won't be any better than what you'd get with an old ISA adapter.
Comment