Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Waaaaah!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Waaaaah!

    Well, I finally got my Cornerstone monitor, and...

    WAAAAH! I MISS MY G400!

    - Gurm

    P.S. In case you were wondering, NO the Kyro2 is NOT up to snuff on a nice monitor.
    The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!

    I'm the least you could do
    If only life were as easy as you
    I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
    If only life were as easy as you
    I would still get screwed

  • #2
    I've been using a KyroII (Herc Prophet 4500) "loaner" for the last few weeks. My first impressions were that it wasn't as crisp an image as my Max. You get used to it over time but I would prefer getting my Max to run with the Gigger. I only borrowed the card to test out my Gigger hanging problem, which it did solve ... well it has hung twice over that time. I haven't gamed much with it except currently playing Myst III which came with the card. Q3A always hung on launch. I'll be returning it soon anyway so I'm not too worried.
    <TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>

    Comment


    • #3
      A couple of my friends have Kyro2s. They looked pretty comparable to the G400 at 1024x768 on their monitors (Sony 17" somthing-or-other and a KDS AV17tf). I never saw them at any better res.

      amish
      Despite my nickname causing confusion, I have no religious affiliations.

      Comment


      • #4
        I run at 10x7x32 on a 17". The Herc KyroII image just appears a bit grainy compared to the Max as well as a bit dimmer. I boosted the Gamma correction a bit but I liked that image even less. I've been running with a Max for the last two years so I noticed the difference right off. You probably wouldn't notice the difference if you weren't accustomed to that particular monitor/graphics card/cable combo.
        <TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>

        Comment


        • #5
          Matrox got us spoiled all right. I could buy a G-fart II MX400 64Mb NOW (they´re very cheap), but NOOO. I´m sticking with that beautiful crispness and color on my Sony Trinitron monitor.
          Waiting for a Matrox gaming card to come out. If it doesn´t, I´ll go for an ATI, in a couple of months time.

          Comment


          • #6
            I put an MX400 in a system I built just for playing games. The colors are weak and the quality much worse. It's almost annoying to play games on. It scrambles letters frequently too. If it wasn't for the speed I definitly would chuck it. I may get an ATI for it instead.
            Mine: Epox EP-8KTA3, Matrox G400 32mb DH + RRG, Athlon 1.2/266, 256mb, WD 30gb ATA100, Pio 32x CDROM, Adaptec 2940U2W, WD 18.3GB 10k U2W, Yamaha CDRW4416, Pio DVD-303, Scsi Zip 100, Seagate 10/20 Gb tape, SBlive platinum, Linksys 10/100 nic, HP 712c printer, HP 6200 scanner, Linksys 4port cable router, Linksys 2port print server/switch
            Hers: Epox EP-3VSA, G400 32mb SH, PIII 750, 256mb, WD 10gb, Pio 6x DVD, Zip 250, Diamond S90, Linksys 10/100 nic

            Comment


            • #7
              I just put my Max back in after returning the Herc this afternoon. Glad to have the rich colors back. I just updated to the latest BIOS to see if that helps but I expect to see it hang again soon.
              <TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>

              Comment


              • #8
                There's nothing better than a "Well Hung" Max....LOL

                Paul
                "Never interfere with the enemy when he is in the process of destroying himself"

                Comment


                • #9
                  Picked up a cheap cheap ($90 retail) Radeon 64MB SDR. Seems ok so far - much crisper than the Kyro2. Why can't someone make a good video card? (Rhetorical question - don't bother answering!)

                  - Gurm
                  The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!

                  I'm the least you could do
                  If only life were as easy as you
                  I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
                  If only life were as easy as you
                  I would still get screwed

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Gurm
                    Why can't someone make a good video card?
                    Because ... oh wait ... never mind
                    Seth, are you ok? I`m peachy Kate. The world is my oyster. - Seth Gecko

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      My Max got well hung last night , as expected, on the torturous "Greebe" avatar. I don't know if I want to be much more patient waiting for Matrox to get their act together. I'm really starting to think I'll have to pick up something else soon, probably a Radeon. I need to have DH for DVD watching on TV and I need stability under W2K and image quality is of utmost importance. I hope the W2K Radeon drivers have gotten to the point where I wouldn't run into many problems. The 8500DV looks intriguing but that could be quite a while before the drivers prove themselves.
                      <TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'm running a Radeon 64DDR now on WindowsXP and haven't had many problems at all. Though call me crazy, but I think that my marvel G400 'loaded' faster than my Radeon. What I mean by this is that when I reset my computer, or I'm booting into linux, it takes longer for the screen to come up. I have no idea what is causing this, but I noticed it the instance I put in the new card. The other thing I noticed, which goes without saying, is that the display is not as crisp. I keep my resolution in 1600x1200x32bit and the text looks a little blurred. Supposedly the 8500 is better. I'll get one of those (unless Matrox comes out with something equally badass) as soon as I upgrade more internal things (such as motherboard and processor) Probably sometime after the end of the year. I'll have to see the performance on one of those new AMD XP processors alongside the 8500 (drool) Though I am thinking that soon I'd like to just buy into getting an AMD Hammer (64bit? It's about TIME!!!) Well, that's neither here nor there. Laters.

                        Leech
                        Wah! Wah!

                        In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X