Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WinME - explorer.exe help needed!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    WinME - explorer.exe help needed!

    when i start windows explorer in win ME... it always opens up the 'my documents' folder first... how do i change it to automatically load 'my computer' folder

    btw, i just got ME, and luv it.... ftp/zip explorer integration, wdm sound, faster for gaming, fast bootup/shutdown, stable, etc.. etc... all very nice
    <font size="1">Gigabyte GA-6VXC7-4X MoBo
    VIA Apollo Pro 133a (694x/686A) chipset (4x agp, UDMA 66)
    Celeron II 733 CPU (coppermine 128)
    128meg (2x64) 133mhz SDRam
    Matrox Milleniumm G200 AGP 16 mb
    Creative Sound Blaster Live! 5.1 Digital model 0100 (MP3+, Gamer)
    Quantum LM 30 gig HD 7200 RPM UDMA 66
    Realtek 8029A NIC Card
    Optiquest V775 17" Monitor
    Actima 36X CD-Rom
    Advansys 510 SCSI Card (ISA, but good enuf for my burner)
    Yamaha 6416 CD-RW
    Windows 2000 (primary)
    Slackware Linux 9.0(secondary/emergency)</font>
    Tags: None
  • #2
    I dont have the answer to your question, but since you just installed WinMe I just wanted to make sure that you are aware of the following

    http://forums.murc.ws/showthread.php?s=&threadid=28051


    I just found out, and it ticks me off
    System:
    Asus A7V rev. 1.01p bios 1011
    AMD Thunderbird 800
    SBLive retail with liveware 3.0
    Matrox g400 MAX pd 6.51
    LG Flatron 795FT 17" monitor
    IBM 13.5 GB 7200 hdd
    Pioneer 106-s dvdrom
    WinME
    directx 8.0a
    384mb pc133

    Comment

    • #3
      http://forums.murc.ws/showthread.php?s=&threadid=9299
      Seth, are you ok? I`m peachy Kate. The world is my oyster. - Seth Gecko

      Comment

      • #4
        ME is useless

        I had installed ME, but then I removed it. It does not do anything new that warrnetd my wasted money on it. My 98SE installis more stable.

        I'd rather have Windows 2000.

        Comment

        • #5
          well, we all have different needs, plus it takes a while to realize all the small but nice features it has over 98se...
          btw i find this more stable than 98.... it never has crashed on me.... yet ;-)

          thx omegaRED
          Last edited by nehalmistry; 22 August 2001, 08:44.
          <font size="1">Gigabyte GA-6VXC7-4X MoBo
          VIA Apollo Pro 133a (694x/686A) chipset (4x agp, UDMA 66)
          Celeron II 733 CPU (coppermine 128)
          128meg (2x64) 133mhz SDRam
          Matrox Milleniumm G200 AGP 16 mb
          Creative Sound Blaster Live! 5.1 Digital model 0100 (MP3+, Gamer)
          Quantum LM 30 gig HD 7200 RPM UDMA 66
          Realtek 8029A NIC Card
          Optiquest V775 17" Monitor
          Actima 36X CD-Rom
          Advansys 510 SCSI Card (ISA, but good enuf for my burner)
          Yamaha 6416 CD-RW
          Windows 2000 (primary)
          Slackware Linux 9.0(secondary/emergency)</font>

          Comment

          • #6
            np
            Seth, are you ok? I`m peachy Kate. The world is my oyster. - Seth Gecko

            Comment

            • #7
              Originally posted by nehalmistry
              well, we all have different needs, plus it takes a while to realize all the small but nice features it has over 98se...
              btw i find this more stable than 98.... it never has crashed on me.... yet ;-)

              thx omegaRED
              I did not mean to say it does not have advantages. It is just that it wasn't worth the money for the change.

              Comment

              Previous template Next
              Working...
              X