3DMark2K1 again w/ Radeon

[Helevitia]

OK, I just intsalled a new 1.2GB TB 200MHz FSB AXIA. I overclocked it to 1.3GB. I also own a Radeon AIW 32MB DDR. I overclocked that to 190/190 from 166 Here is my result. I think this is a pretty good score. What do you think?

Dave


3DMark Result 3325 3D marks

Game 1 Car Chase - Low Detail 49.2 FPS
Game 1 Car Chase - High Detail 25.7 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 51.0 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - High Detail 28.5 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - Low Detail 62.1 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - High Detail 30.9 FPS
Game 4 Nature N/A FPS

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 279.0 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 786.5 MTexels/s

High Polygon Count (1 light) 4.9 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 lights) 2.1 MTriangles/s

Environment Bump Mapping 69.5 FPS
DOT3 Bump Mapping 43.9 FPS

Vertex Shader Speed 30.6 FPS
Pixel Shader Speed N/A FPS
Point Sprite Speed 0.6 MSprites/s

[Indiana]

Not a bad score, but I guess the TB1.3GHz helps you a lot here.
Also when looking at the individual scores, I think you should be able to get higher results, as I got similar or even better results with my Duron@1050 for most tests except the Game1 - high quality one (maybe a driver issue here, as with the vertex shader/point sprite tests?).




I was using Win2k, on what OS did you run the test?

EDIT: Two additional things: I had my Radeon oc'ed to 200/200MHz or maybe even 205/205, hence the higher Fillrates.
And I just noticed that you have the 32MB version - this will cost you a few fps as well, so your score seems really good.

[Novdid]

Check that you always have HyperZ enabled. It' just a simple check in regedit.

Can't remember the path though.

Anyways, it is probably unnecessery, HyperZ is enabled I guess.

We have the old smilies back!!!

[Clevor]

It also depends on what drivers you are using for the Radeon. The latest 7184 Betas suck in 3DMark2001, expect your scores to drop by 20-25%, but your 3DMark2000 scores should increase.

Again, ATI and their drivers, tsk tsk tsk.