PDA

View Full Version : Top crunchers 14-20 Aug!



Guru
20th August 2000, 14:11
Individual statistics (times are in GMT(UTC)+1) 20 Aug 22:31 - 14 Aug 22:30 Total Delta WUs
1 GnrlData 505
2 breezer 404
3 Hecubus 238
4 Radioman 121
5 Mark F. 113
6 paulcs 109
7 Maggi 96
8 Manex 96
9 box 93
10 JSB 85
11 hbitsch 85
12 Sisyfos 83
13 Bob & Sons 76
14 Ees 74
15 Guru 72 http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif
16 <-TT-> 71
17 Brian 67
18 dsheridan 67
19 Charles 65
20 KvHagedorn 63

510 members http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif

"Old-Timers" is at #94 with 14 WU's Let's see if we can doubel that! http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/wink.gif

------------------
PIII450@558, ABIT BX6-2, 256RAM, G400MAX, SBLIVE, HOTROD-UDMA66
Join the MURC SETI team! (http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678)

MegaManX4
21st August 2000, 01:46
Will i ever be on that list? There were times....

Ees
21st August 2000, 02:53
The top-20 fastest (August 14-21):

<TABLE BORDER=1><TR><TH>name</TH><TH>wus</TH><TH>hours</TH><TH>average</TH></TR><TR><TD>Manex</TD><TD>144</TD><TD>419.97</TD><TD>2h 55m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Rags</TD><TD>39</TD><TD>114.23</TD><TD>2h 56m</TD></TR><TR><TD>KvHagedorn</TD><TD>76</TD><TD>350.64</TD><TD>4h 37m</TD></TR><TR><TD>cjolley</TD><TD>5</TD><TD>24.74</TD><TD>4h 57m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Mark F.</TD><TD>130</TD><TD>701.28</TD><TD>5h 24m</TD></TR><TR><TD>atra2</TD><TD>2</TD><TD>11.45</TD><TD>5h 43m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Ackerot</TD><TD>24</TD><TD>141.68</TD><TD>5h 54m</TD></TR><TR><TD>cancer</TD><TD>3</TD><TD>17.78</TD><TD>5h 56m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Eye MD</TD><TD>24</TD><TD>142.33</TD><TD>5h 56m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Winwiz</TD><TD>57</TD><TD>350.64</TD><TD>6h 9m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Jorden</TD><TD>4</TD><TD>25.00</TD><TD>6h 15m</TD></TR><TR><TD>paulcs</TD><TD>125</TD><TD>788.94</TD><TD>6h 19m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Sisyfos</TD><TD>96</TD><TD>609.04</TD><TD>6h 21m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Bernd</TD><TD>10</TD><TD>63.78</TD><TD>6h 23m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Kosh</TD><TD>4</TD><TD>25.63</TD><TD>6h 24m</TD></TR><TR><TD>GnrlData</TD><TD>593</TD><TD>3944.70</TD><TD>6h 39m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Duke</TD><TD>14</TD><TD>93.85</TD><TD>6h 42m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Stealth9</TD><TD>26</TD><TD>175.32</TD><TD>6h 45m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Costas D</TD><TD>5</TD><TD>33.80</TD><TD>6h 46m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Fleabus</TD><TD>6</TD><TD>40.62</TD><TD>6h 46m</TD></TR></TABLE>

Ees
21st August 2000, 02:55
And by effort:

<TABLE BORDER=1><TR><TH>name</TH><TH>hours</TH><TH>weeks</TH></TR><TR><TD>breezer</TD><TD>4205.60</TD><TD>25.03</TD></TR><TR><TD>GnrlD ata</TD><TD>3891.96</TD><TD>23.17</TD></TR><TR><TD>Tlaloc</TD><TD>2772.90</TD><TD>16.51</TD></TR><TR><TD>Hecubus</TD><TD>2099.52</TD><TD>12.50</TD></TR><TR><TD>Alastair</TD><TD>138 8.70</TD><TD>8.27</TD></TR><TR><TD>Radioman</TD><TD>1148.16</TD><TD>6.83</TD></TR><TR><TD>Bob & Sons</TD><TD>1128.25</TD><TD>6.72</TD></TR><TR><TD>Brian</TD><TD>1065.11</TD><TD>6.34</TD></TR><TR><TD>box</TD><TD>1047.98</TD><TD>6.24</TD></TR><TR><TD>Charles</TD><TD>1016.56</TD ><TD>6.05</TD></TR><TR><TD>ATinyMouse</TD><TD>1000.52</TD><TD>5.96</TD></TR><TR><TD>hbitsch</TD><TD>936.78</TD><TD>5.58</TD></TR><TR><TD>JSB</TD><TD>920.11</TD><TD>5.48</TD></TR><T R><TD><-TT-></TD><TD>881.40</TD><TD>5.25</TD></TR><TR><TD>Andy Watling</TD><TD>849.55</TD><TD>5.06</TD></TR><TR><TD>dsheridan</TD><TD>803.87</TD><TD>4.78</TD></TR><TR><TD>JJc</TD><TD>791.79</TD><TD>4.71</TD></TR><TR><TD>paulcs</TD><TD>782.04</ TD><TD>4.65</TD></TR><TR><TD>NauTiLUS</TD><TD>780.96</TD><TD>4.65</TD></TR></TABLE>

(This table will probably be messed up again; if so, I won't even bother trying to repair...)

(Edit: but I did edit out one bogus entry http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/wink.gif)

Martin


[This message has been edited by Ees (edited 21 August 2000).]

paulcs
21st August 2000, 03:18
There was an attempt to take attendance on the Soap Box. I would like to see some of the good performers who might not even know this forum exists give us a visit.

Could our glorious founder drop some of these people a line and invite them to stop by so we can give them a pat on the back. I think our strong suit is a really good sense of team, centered around the forums, and if that's communicated to some of our more anonymous teammates, they'd be less likely to up and leave.

These people are frequently mentioned in posts, and are welcomed and regularly patted on the back. It would be nice to know that they know we appreciate their efforts.

Just a thought. If Steve needs help, I'd certainly do whatever I can. If we've already tried this, well, forget I mentioned it. http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif

Paul
paulcs@flashcom.net

Mark F
21st August 2000, 12:30
Great idea Paul.

I second the motion.

Pace
21st August 2000, 13:02
Just wondering how you do the stats in the forums Martin - I think you mentioned once before that you can automatically generate the tables.

Paul.

------------------
Pace3000 Network:
Arena (http://homepage.ntlworld.com/paul.mccarroll/hosted/arena) | P3K (http://www.pace3000.freeserve.co.uk) | TechSupport (http://homepage.ntlworld.com/paul.mccarroll/hosted/support) | Portal (http://homepage.ntlworld.com/paul.mccarroll/portal.htm)
Join SETI@MURC! (http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678) | Boost SETI@MURC! (coming soon to the 'Arena' site)

Ees
21st August 2000, 23:46
Pace: I keep all the stats in a database, so producing the weekly summaries is quite easy (just a few SQL queries). I could automate it, but I'm too lazy. It only takes a few minutes anyway.

I think it would be great to point our "anonymous" team mates here. We should just be very careful not to give the impression of spamming or "spying". A few months back, Steve sent an e-mail to some "inactive" team members, trying to revive their seti efforts. It helped somewhat, but I'm not sure how much of a lasting effect it had.

I'm also considering posting an anouncement of seti.matroxusers.com in one of the seti newsgroups (alt.sci.seti would be a good candidate), but I don't particularly like the idea of pimping my own site. It would probably mean a few new members though. What do you guys think?

Martin

paulcs
22nd August 2000, 01:01
If it's something commonly done on alt.sci.seti, I don't see a problem with it.

Paul
paulcs@flashcom.net