PDA

View Full Version : Top 10 crunchers 7-13 Aug



Guru
13th August 2000, 14:21
Individual statistics (times are in GMT(UTC)+1) Aug 13 22:30 Aug 07 22:30 Total Delta WUs
Rank WUs Rank WUs Rank WUs Rank WUs Rank WUs
1 GnrlData 455
2 breezer 387
3 Hecubus 170
4 paulcs 118
5 Mark F. 111
6 JSB 103
7 Sisyfos 97
8 Charles 96
9 box 90
10 Radioman 87

------------------
PIII450@558, ABIT BX6-2, 256RAM, G400MAX, SBLIVE, HOTROD-UDMA66
Join the MURC SETI team! (http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678)

Sisyfos
13th August 2000, 14:57
Oh my gosh! You've gone and posted the results before they were made!!! (I hate this time zone £*/$# hrmph)

Anyway, 97 WUs at 7th is nice.
Hasn't done wonders for my average though.

Btw, what's with this?
Quoted from http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_list.html :
6/29/00 Note: Many users have noticed the number of workunits processed by a team is significantly different than the sum of the workunits processed by its users. This is due to a backlog of team statistics that we are currently working on clearing. Thank you for your patience.

Seems like our WUs are ~5.500 lower than the sum of our members. It kind of devaluates the team stats as the 'back log' is different between teams.

------------------
Join the MURC SETI team! (http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678)

View the exciting stats (http://seti.matroxusers.com)

Ees
13th August 2000, 23:21
Thanks, Guru! http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif

Martin

box
13th August 2000, 23:28
Hej Sisyfos

Rart at se to århusianere på top 10'en.

Ees
14th August 2000, 00:11
I totally agree. I think.

And now: the top-20 fastest for last week (Aug 7-14):

<TABLE BORDER=1><TR><TH>name</TH><TH>wus</TH><TH>hours</TH><TH>average</TH></TR><TR><TD>Rags</TD><TD>45</TD><TD>121.17</TD><TD>2h 42m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Manex</TD><TD>48</TD><TD>149.20</TD><TD>3h 6m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Atelier Media</TD><TD>38</TD><TD>175.32</TD><TD>4h 37m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Mark F.</TD><TD>131</TD><TD>613.62</TD><TD>4h 41m</TD></TR><TR><TD>cjolley</TD><TD>3</TD><TD>14.93</TD><TD>4h 59m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Greebe</TD><TD>35</TD><TD>175.32</TD><TD>5h 1m</TD></TR><TR><TD>DentyCracker</TD><TD>17</TD><TD>87.66</TD><TD>5h 9m</TD></TR><TR><TD>cancer</TD><TD>5</TD><TD>26.09</TD><TD>5h 13m</TD></TR><TR><TD>KvHagedorn</TD><TD>64</TD><TD>350.64</TD><TD>5h 29m</TD></TR><TR><TD>atra2</TD><TD>2</TD><TD>11.18</TD><TD>5h 35m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Eye MD</TD><TD>23</TD><TD>133.75</TD><TD>5h 49m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Ackerot</TD><TD>25</TD><TD>154.90</TD><TD>6h 12m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Jorden</TD><TD>5</TD><TD>31.66</TD><TD>6h 20m</TD></TR><TR><TD>paulcs</TD><TD>138</TD><TD>876.60</TD><TD>6h 21m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Winwiz</TD><TD>69</TD><TD>438.30</TD><TD>6h 21m</TD></TR><TR><TD>NadesX</TD><TD>12</TD><TD>76.82</TD><TD>6h 24m</TD></TR><TR><TD>GnrlData</TD><TD>532</TD><TD>3418.74</TD><TD>6h 26m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Kosh</TD><TD>7</TD><TD>45.39</TD><TD>6h 29m</TD></TR><TR><TD>numzkull</TD><TD>5</TD><TD>32.70</TD><TD>6h 32m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Jakob Kruse</TD><TD>67</TD><TD>438.30</TD><TD>6h 33m</TD></TR></TABLE>

Martin

Ees
14th August 2000, 00:27
And the top-20 by effort (total CPU hours):

<TABLE BORDER=1><TR><TH>name</TH><TH>hours</TH><TH>weeks</TH></TR><TR><TD>breezer</TD><TD>3628.60</TD><TD>21.60</TD></TR><TR><TD>GnrlData</TD><TD>3409.40</TD><TD>20.29</TD></TR><TR><TD>Ch arles</TD><TD>1593.12</TD><TD>9.48</TD></TR><TR><TD>Alastair</TD><TD>1404.70</TD><TD>8.36</TD></TR><TR><TD>Hecubus</TD><TD>1399.90</TD><TD>8.33</TD></TR><TR><TD>Bob & Sons</TD><TD>1346.48</TD><TD>8.01</TD></TR><TR><TD>box</TD><TD>1145.06</TD><TD>6.82</TD></TR><TR><TD>ATinyMouse</TD><TD>1038.16</TD><TD>6.18</TD></TR><TR><TD>Narcissus</TD><TD>989. 53</TD><TD>5.89</TD></TR><TR><TD>JSB</TD><TD>975.19</TD><TD>5.80</TD></TR><TR><TD>Brian</TD><TD>918.36</TD><TD>5.47</TD></TR><TR><TD>paulcs</TD><TD>899.94</TD><TD>5.36</TD></TR><TR ><TD>hbitsch</TD><TD>878.36</TD><TD>5.23</TD></TR><TR><TD>Andy Watling</TD><TD>871.36</TD><TD>5.19</TD></TR><TR><TD>Sisyfos</TD><TD>868.82</TD><TD>5.17</TD></TR><TR><TD>Radioman</TD><TD>854.24</TD><TD>5.08</TD></TR><TR><TD>JJc</TD><TD>838.24</ TD><TD>4.99</TD></TR><TR><TD>DirtFarmer</TD><TD>804.00</TD><TD>4.79</TD></TR><TR><TD>NauTiLUS</TD><TD>787.76</TD><TD>4.69</TD></TR><TR><TD>Rimfaxe</TD><TD>742.62</TD><TD>4.42</TD>< /TR></TABLE>

The reason GnrlData's numbers are different is because I followed Rattledagger's suggestion in last weeks thread; thanks!

Martin

(Edit: note to ubb: kindly keep your hands of my ranking-by-effort table! Tried to solve, probably won't work...)

[This message has been edited by Ees (edited 14 August 2000).]

Sisyfos
14th August 2000, 00:38
Hej box

Jeg tror snart vi skal omdøbe teamet til Matrox (Årh)Users.

------------------
Join the MURC SETI team! (http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678)

View the exciting stats (http://seti.matroxusers.com)

MegaManX4
14th August 2000, 01:14
Damn, babelfish doesn't understand dutch http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/frown.gif

Ees
14th August 2000, 01:16
Mega,

What part of "Aarhus, Denmark" do you have problems with?

http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/wink.gif Martin

box
14th August 2000, 01:40
Sisyfos: Yep, jeg kan også se mindst en årh-user på fastest-listen.

Megaman: As a german, can't you spot dutch when you see it? http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif

(and then perhaps go from there to spot non-dutch?)

BTW Ich habe nur gesagt, das es sehr gut war, zwei leute aus Aarhus auf dem top 10 zu sehen...

So there.

[This message has been edited by box (edited 14 August 2000).]

Ees
14th August 2000, 05:00
Sisyfos,

Yes, that's a problem. This is also the reason why e.g. the "Daily Team Stats" thread on the TA-forums uses setiteam stats. I.e., get the numbers for all teams through their CGI-page and sum all individuals.

For a number of reasons, I'm very reluctant to do the same for seti.matroxusers.com. I just hope that S@H will fix their stats.

Martin

Jammrock
14th August 2000, 05:35
I don't think I have my Seti thing setup right. I'm running an Athlon 650 w/128 MB RAM and a high speed Internet connection and it took my computer almost 20 hours to crunch 1 WU from Seti! Something's not right here.

Any suggestions?

Jammrock

------------------
Athlon 650, Biostar board, 128 MB PC133 (Crucial), G400 32 MB DH, SB Live! w/ Digital I/O, 10/100 NIC, lots of case fans, etc...

veon ake
14th August 2000, 07:45
In response to Jammrocks problem:

Make sure that you dont have any other cpu intensive applications running at the same time as Seti is running. My comp is similar to yours, a little faster but I am getting an average around 9 hours per unit. So you should be around there if you close all unnecessary applications and make sure you let it just run in screen saver mode, unless of course your running the command line version. Also if you have the screen saver make sure you set the screen to go blank after a bit, it improves the speed a little. Hope I could be of help.

Veon Ake
_________________________

Athlon 700@770(got2buythatgoldfinger), Epox EB-7KXA mainboard, 128 MB PC100, G400 32 MB DH, SB 64

MegaManX4
14th August 2000, 10:09
Hi Veon,

new here? If so: WELCOME TO THE LIGHT SITE http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif!


Setting the seti gui version to run as the screensaver is not a good idea, it increases WU times about 45%. Setting it blank mode of course disables the loss of CPU time.
Using the cmd_line version is always the best.

Mega

Jammrock
14th August 2000, 11:28
Thanks for the insight. I've been running it in screensaver mode, with no other CPU intensive apps opened. After all, this is my gaming machine, too http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif

I'll check out the command line version and see if it speeds things up. That or run the gui version in blank mode.

Thanks!

Jammrock

Sisyfos
14th August 2000, 16:27
Btw, what's with this?
Quoted from http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_list.html :
6/29/00 Note: Many users have noticed the number of workunits processed by a team is significantly different than the sum of the workunits processed by its users. This is due to a backlog of team statistics that we are currently working on clearing. Thank you for your patience.

Seems like our WUs are ~5.500 lower than the sum of our members. It kind of devaluates the team stats as the 'back log' is different between teams.



Well, has anyone been pondering this???


------------------
Join the MURC SETI team! (http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678)

View the exciting stats (http://seti.matroxusers.com)

[This message has been edited by Sisyfos (edited 14 August 2000).]

MegaManX4
14th August 2000, 16:31
Everything I do not understand is dutch or Suaheli http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/wink.gif.


I didn't see this Denmark thingy

Assimilator1
14th August 2000, 17:14
>>>>Also if you have the screen saver make sure you set the screen to go blank after a bit, it improves the speed a little. <<<<

A little!??? ,it will roughly halve your WU time if you enable 'blank screen' & set it to no more than 5 mins! http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif(it's in the screen saver settings)

------------------
I guess I won't recruit for my team here ;) Team Anandtech

Maggi
15th August 2000, 05:22
Just set it to 0 minutes ... http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/wink.gif

no need for those ugly gfx imho

http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif

cjolley
15th August 2000, 09:52
I leave the gfx on at work.
That way I don't come in in the morning and hit the power switch. http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/frown.gif
chuck

PS This only happens if I have some unsaved work on my desktop. http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/biggrin.gif

Rags
15th August 2000, 11:20
Using the cmd_line version is always the best.
Not always. For me the CL version adds about 45 minutes to my wu's under windows, when compared to the gui version. I am not the only one, I know of a few others with the same experience.

Rags

Assimilator1
18th August 2000, 18:05
Darn! ,sometimes SETI seems to work like black magic!

KvHagedorn
18th August 2000, 21:21
Gee, Mega.. don't you live in Lübeck? And you can't recognize Danish? That's right next door! You need to get out more.

http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/wink.gif

------------------
Kind Regards,

KvH

MegaManX4
19th August 2000, 03:16
Yep, living in Lübeck.

But Danish is not that similar to german though http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/frown.gif, as you probably know

Mega

ScooterX
19th August 2000, 11:11
Woohoo!! I finally made it to the top 100