PDA

View Full Version : Beta 2.70 speeds



Rattledagger
18th July 2000, 10:52
As people using the 2.66-beta know, this version was very slow.
The 2.70-version on the other hand seems to be fast, maybe even faster than cmd-2.04
My 3 first units:
6h35m48s, 5h29m55,9s and 6h14m50,1s
The middle had probably no gaussian, while the two others had gaussian.

With 2.66 I had between 26,5h and 31,5h. Since both only graphic versions, and doesn't report cpu-time, this partially explaines the highest result.

My average on cmd-2.04 have the last time been around 7,5h, but since dual-cpu-machine it's not directly comparable.

I'm running one instance of cmd-2.04 alongside the beta. Alongside 2.66 the times is comparable to the 2.7-results, while now the times is back to normal for two instances. 2.66 didn't use more than 49% cpu in real-mode, while 2.7 uses 50% as it should. (forced to one cpu)

------------------
Asus P2B-DS, dual P3-600, 256 MB, G200, SB 128. OS: NT 4/5.

Assimilator1
18th July 2000, 15:22
Cool http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif ,I'll have to see if the team member I'm cracking for as a beta tester has got it yet.I'll report back too

------------------
I guess I won't recruit for my team here ;) TA

Assimilator1
19th July 2000, 16:49
Hmmm,I don't think it fairs so well for Celerons ,my 366 @ 550 ,CAS2 RAM ,Win95c has done 39,7% in 4hrs 50 mins.
BTW CLi v2.4 WU's usually take me about 7.8hrs
I'll keep you posted

------------------
I guess I won't recruit for my team here http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/wink.gif TA



[This message has been edited by Assimilator1 (edited 20 July 2000).]

Assimilator1
20th July 2000, 11:50
My 1st WU took 11hrs 32 mins http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/frown.gif

------------------
I guess I won't recruit for my team here ;) TA

Rattledagger
21st July 2000, 16:57
Sorry for the long delay, but the power company has worked on something the two last evenings. Computers doesn't run fast without power. http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif

I've completed 11 units now, getting an average of 6h38m with ver. 2.7
Most is lying around 5,5h and 6,5h, I suppose due to gausian/no-gausian.
But I've got one unit, running to 11h2m
If it's a bug, or some "interesting" units containing something what needs much more extensive computing, I don't know.

Since I saw this slowness, I kept the unit and ran it under cmd-2.04 too. The cmd-line didn't detect anything, while 2.70 found 1 pulse, 2 triplets, 5 spikes. It didn't contain gausian.

If you've only run one unit, maybe you got one of the slow ones. http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif

Assimilator1
21st July 2000, 19:07
Looks like I had a slow 1 ,here's my latest WU times.

6 hrs 51 mins
6 hrs 2 mins



[This message has been edited by Assimilator1 (edited 22 July 2000).]