View Full Version : Fastest seti@murcers Jun 15-22

22nd June 2000, 08:14
Great Martin!!

Looks like I am still hanging in the top 10 http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif
That will change from Saturday onward... http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/wink.gif


22nd June 2000, 11:02
Dang. If it hadn't been for the fact that the first 200-250 WU's I did were on my achingly slow K6-2 350 and PII333 I'd be close to you guys. As is it's going to take another month or 3 to pull my average back down enough. It's at 25hrs+ right now even though on my Athlon650 and PII350 my average is significantly lower.

Oh well. http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif I'll get there eventually, and when I (maybe) upgrade to a dual Athlon later this year then I'll really start to fly.(assuming that SETI@Home is still going by the end of the year.)


22nd June 2000, 12:05
Where's Maggi & his glowing hot CeleryII ? http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/wink.gif

ABit BF6, P3-650@923, 256mb@142cas3, 10gb IBM@7200, SB Live Value@3.0, Pioneer 104s DVD, Mitsumi CDRW@2x2x8, Acatel 1000 ADSL@1.5mb/sec, Linksys EtherFast NIC, LG 995e, USB mouse,Matrox G400 MAX!!!! :D

22nd June 2000, 14:23
Ian, the above times are averages of the WU's crunched in the past week, so no matter how slow you crunched until a week before that, if you've speeded up by now, you could be in the top 20 of fastest WU (Manchu - Gesundheid http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/wink.gif)-crunchers of next week http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif


22nd June 2000, 16:59
<TABLE BORDER=1><TR><TH>name</TH><TH>wus</TH><TH>hours</TH><TH>average</TH></TR><TR><TD>Rags</TD><TD>43</TD><TD>98.93</TD><TD>2h 18m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Manex</TD><TD>96</TD><TD>277.22</TD><TD>2h 53m</TD></TR><TR><TD>cjolley</TD><TD>21</TD><TD>106.53</TD><TD>5h 4m</TD></TR><TR><TD>cancer</TD><TD>11</TD><TD>56.53</TD><TD>5h 8m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Mark F.</TD><TD>118</TD><TD>613.62</TD><TD>5h 12m</TD></TR><TR><TD>jms</TD><TD>67</TD><TD>350.64</TD><TD>5h 14m</TD></TR><TR><TD>giskard</TD><TD>54</TD><TD>309.10</TD><TD>5h 43m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Jakob Kruse</TD><TD>61</TD><TD>350.64</TD><TD>5h 45m</TD></TR><TR><TD>KvHagedorn</TD><TD>67</TD><TD>392.30</TD><TD>5h 51m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Jorden</TD><TD>10</TD><TD>58.89</TD><TD>5h 53m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Eye MD</TD><TD>19</TD><TD>112.62</TD><TD>5h 56m</TD></TR><TR><TD>paulcs</TD><TD>100</TD><TD>613.62</TD><TD>6h 8m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Ackerot</TD><TD>20</TD><TD>123.36</TD><TD>6h 10m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Guyver</TD><TD>42</TD><TD>262.98</TD><TD>6h 16m</TD></TR><TR><TD>VSA</TD><TD>65</TD><TD>438.30</TD><TD>6h 45m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Winwiz</TD><TD>65</TD><TD>438.30</TD><TD>6h 45m</TD></TR><TR><TD>minsoo</TD><TD>16</TD><TD>109.74</TD><TD>6h 52m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Buuri</TD><TD>18</TD><TD>124.70</TD><TD>6h 56m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Kosh</TD><TD>7</TD><TD>48.66</TD><TD>6h 57m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Swing</TD><TD>18</TD><TD>127.53</TD><TD>7h 5m</TD></TR></TABLE>

23rd June 2000, 02:27
Hi Chuck,

the other rigs I use keep my average down ... http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/frown.gif

23rd June 2000, 08:04
Aha! Thats nice to know, thanks Jord. http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif
Well, in that case, now I just have to try and convince my CPU and Mobo that they want to be stable at 6.5x110. Of course the real problem is that I have to convince my G200 that IT wants to be stable at that speed.(yeah right, that'll be the day)
Well, if Matrox feels like being really nice they could give me a nice suprise to come back to when I return from vacation next week. That would surely fix that problem(along with a number of others http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/smile.gif ).


23rd June 2000, 16:47

5:45 - I wonder how I got that time with one machine averaging around 6 hours and two others around 7 hours???

Must've been a week's worth of fast WUs :-)

Mark F
23rd June 2000, 23:30
Your G200 won't run at 110? Or your MoBo won't do 2:3 AGP (d@mn LX)? My G200 will do 133, but, it's "only doing 124 right now.

Mark F.

OH NO, my retractable cup holder swallowed a DVD...
and burped out a movie