Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Coppermine vs Althlon with a Marvel G400

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Coppermine vs Althlon with a Marvel G400

    I'll always vote for Intel regardless.

    1-More compatible
    2-more support

    Cheers,
    Elie

  • #2
    Have never bought anything but Intel, but they are having troubles getting rid of the Athlon, so I am thinking it may be pretty decent.

    I am sure you are right that support would be better with them.

    Techman2 Dual Celery 366@458 marvel g400 64 meg 20 gig scsi CDR and 5 disk changer sb16 audio win 98 and win 2k

    Comment


    • #3
      Coppermine vs Althlon with a Marvel G400

      Anyone have some first hand knowledge of which one of these two beauties works best with our beloved G400?

      ------------------
      Techman2 Dual Celery 366@458 marvel g400 64 meg 20 gig scsi CDR and 5 disk changer sb16 audio win 98 and win 2k
      Techman2 Dual Celery 366@458 marvel g400 64 meg 20 gig scsi CDR and 5 disk changer sb16 audio win 98 and win 2k

      Comment


      • #4
        I vote AMD:

        1-Faster
        2-Cheaper

        Comment


        • #5
          I have thought that too, but now that they are trying to rush a chip like the coppermine with the on chip/at processor speed cache, I am wondering if they really have a speed advantage anymore?



          ------------------
          Techman2 Dual Celery 366@458 marvel g400 64 meg 20 gig scsi CDR and 5 disk changer sb16 audio win 98 and win 2k
          Techman2 Dual Celery 366@458 marvel g400 64 meg 20 gig scsi CDR and 5 disk changer sb16 audio win 98 and win 2k

          Comment

          Working...
          X