Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PD6 beta, G200 and 1024*768..

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    PD6 beta, G200 and 1024*768..

    I try to install PD6beta with install.inf from PD5.52 and have this result:
    system work is fine, but in some ames (WarBirds 2.76,Urban Operation..) i can't to set resolution 1024*768 - i'v got message "This resolution does not
    support your hardware - try 640*480"
    However, NFS PU working in 1024*768
    Help me, please
    Tags: None
  • #2
    I haven't had such problems... but then again I don't run many games at 1024x768..
    I don't have WarBirds but I'll try F4 tonight and see what's up...

    don't you think playing with 1024 in NFS:PU is a bit overkill?? I have a P3650E@910 at the moment and wouldn't even think of trying that res... it's out of the cards Fillrate range...

    Craig
    1.3 Taulatin @1600 - Watercooled, DangerDen waterblock, Enhiem 1046 pump, 8x6x2 HeaterCore Radiator - Asus TUSL2C - 256 MB Corsair PC150 - G400 DH 32b SGR - IBM 20Gb 75GXP HDD - InWin A500

    Comment

    • #3
      hi, Stringy

      Hmm.. I have a Celeron333(overclocking to 515),
      G200 Millenium 8mb SGRAM (no overclocking), mboard Acorp VIA85
      (Apollo Pro 100) and 64mb RAM.
      I believe i had satisfactory fillrate in NFS:PU with 1024*768
      BTW, how i can measure this fillrate?

      Comment

      • #4
        Hey there..
        I tried F4 at 1024, no problems.. well that is in the Game itself.. but when I flew around abit and wanted to go back to the menu screen it dropped me to desktop... not so good but F4 is a work in progress... ;o)

        As fer NFS:PU, yes @1024x768 is was "Ok" but I could still feel a delay... I have a Force Feedback stick and if the Frame rate is borderline I can't "feel" the speed and get the whole experience.. at 800x600 it's perfect..
        As fer FillRate, it's the Speed at which the card can draw... well this is a limitation do the chip, being as how a G200 is clocked at around 84Mhz you get 84Million Pixels per second... not all that impressive... I'm O/C'ed mine to 91Mhz Core...

        Craig
        1.3 Taulatin @1600 - Watercooled, DangerDen waterblock, Enhiem 1046 pump, 8x6x2 HeaterCore Radiator - Asus TUSL2C - 256 MB Corsair PC150 - G400 DH 32b SGR - IBM 20Gb 75GXP HDD - InWin A500

        Comment

        • #5
          You may even want to consider going back from PD 6.0 beta. I've found it to be slower on my G200 (8MB SGRAM version) than the 5.41 drivers. I saw a ~4 FPS drop in UT. Not too much until you consider I average only 24 FPS (640x480x32 -- UTBench). Moreover, I saw ~100 point 3DMark2000 drop. Once again, doesn't seem like much until you consider that drop was from 941 to 841.

          -Mike

          Comment

          Previous template Next
          Working...
          X