Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

w2k

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • w2k

    I´m thinking of upgrading to w2k!
    my matrox g400 MAX does very well in w98

    Is there any problems with w2k?

    /Patrik

  • #2
    The most obvious flaw in the Win2K drivers for the G400, besides the fact that they don't work with SMP_1 (which is a flaw but is not as "obvious" and everyone doesn't have SMP), is that the refresh rate at 1152x864 is only 75 Hz. When you have become used to 85+ Hz it kinda "hurts" your eyes! to drop back to 75 Hz. Since this is the prefered resolution for many of us with 19" monitors, the only recourse is to download a copy of PowerStrip to reset the refresh to 85+ Hz.

    Just understand that Win2K really is a OS geared towards servers and the workplace. It's not really a "gaming" platform. In particular any EA game won't install! Others like UT don't have this problem. Win2K is a great platform for AutoCAD and 3D Graphics work. It seems to perform best when NTFS is installed. This requires more hard drive space in most cases, but it is more secure. If that's a concern.

    I'm going to have to remain in the Dual-Boot configuration myself. Just too many games to play. Though I prefer Win2K for most of my desktop applications.
    <a href="http://www.gaijindesign.com/lawriemalen/jedi" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.gaijindesign.com/lawriemalen/jedi/yoda.jpg" width="285" height="123" border="0"><br>:: how jedi are you? ::</a>

    Comment


    • #3
      For me the most obvious flaw is that the dualmonitor feature doesn't work correctly with win2k. You will only have the clone modus or one large desktop, but not 2 seperate desktops as on win98.

      And of course a lot of games don't work on win2k, or they run slower than on win98.

      So you need a dualboot system if you want to use the whole potential of the G400

      edzel

      Comment


      • #4
        For me the most obvious flaw is that the dualmonitor feature doesn't work correctly with win2k. You will only have the clone modus or one large desktop, but not 2 separate desktops as on win98.

        And of course a lot of games don't work on win2k, or they run slower than on win98.

        So you need a dualboot system if you want to use the whole potential of the G400

        edzel

        Comment


        • #5
          For me the most obvious flaw is that the dualmonitor feature doesn't work correctly with win2k. You will only have the clone modus or one large desktop, but not 2 separate desktops as on win98.

          And of course a lot of games don't work on win2k, or they run slower than on win98.

          So you need a dualboot system if you want to use the whole potential of the G400

          edzel

          Comment


          • #6
            GROUNDHOG DAY all over again !

            Tell all the people having no problems
            with games on WIN 2000 that it's not
            a gaming platform !
            pentium III @550mhz
            intel 440BX pci chipset
            512mb memory, g400max,
            cybervision C70 monitor
            win2000 on maxtor 8.4 gb

            Comment


            • #7
              You can tell that to whoever you like, Rob_b, but don't bother trying to tell me. I've mostly been playing UT and a little Q3A for the last several months, and have found that Win2K is just as good as Win98 for me most of the time, and good enough ALL of the time.


              ------------------
              Ace
              "..so much for subtlety.."

              System specs:
              Gainward Ti4600
              AMD Athlon XP2100+ (o.c. to 1845MHz)

              Comment

              Working...
              X