Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1152x864 85 hz need it now!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1152x864 85 hz need it now!!!

    please matrox give us the setting 1152x864 85hz!
    i do not care about the games i just want to use that resolutie and NOT 1152x864 75 hz!!!!
    i had to trow in a viper 550 and that realy sucks but he let me use the setting 1152x864 85 hz !!!!
    it takes far to long to wait for powerdesk 6.1 because it is also possible in the current driver.


  • #2
    Since you mention PD 6.1, I assume your OS is Win2K...

    This will get you by until Matrox gets their Win2K driver in order: (you shouldn't need this for WinNT4 or Win9x- but it would work there too)

    Try Powerstrip, get the 2.64.03 off the "news" page:
    http://www.entechtaiwan.com/news.htm

    One the startup form, select "custom refresh rate" (you may have to start it a 2nd time after install to get this form.) It doesn't have the most intuitive UI, but it works. I'm now happily at 120 Hz w/ my G200 at 1152x864 in Win2K.

    Select "auto run" for it to run on login and switch to your refresh rate automatically.

    [This message has been edited by LrngToFly (edited 06 March 2000).]

    Comment


    • #3
      The 75Hz limitation is a bummer. I ended up doing the 1280x960 hack to get 85Hz. This ultimately worked best for me because that happened to be my favorite resolution when I used to run Win 9x. 1280x1024 has always sucked on my Sony 400PS, I get nasty black borders around the screen and every looks "stretched" when I adjust image for full screen.

      I've been told 75Hz, even 60Hz, is very tolerable, but I have sensitive eyes and anything less than 85Hz is very noticeable to me.

      Comment


      • #4


        Matrox has given me that.....I've been using 1152X864 at 85 Hz since the day I got my G400Max. Works great on Sony GDM F400.

        Comment


        • #5
          Under monitor setting, you can choose any refresh rate you want, so long as your monitor and the G400 supports it. At 1152X864 32-bit, I can push it up to 108hz!

          ------------------
          Celeron 366@567 2.2V, 128meg generic PC-100 RAM (running at CAS2) Abit BH6, G400 16meg DH@150/200, Western Digital Expert 18gig, Ricoh mp7040A(morphed to mp7060A) Pioneer 6X DVD slot load, Motorola Cable Modem w/DEC ethernet card, Soundblaster Live Value Ver. 2, Viewsonic GT 775


          Celeron 566@877 1.8V, 256meg generic PC-100 RAM (running at CAS2) Abit BH6, G400 16meg DH@150/200, Western Digital Expert 18gig, Ricoh mp7040A(morphed to mp7060A) Pioneer 6X DVD slot load, Motorola Cable Modem w/DEC ethernet card, Soundblaster Live Value Ver. 2, Viewsonic GT 775

          Comment


          • #6
            in win98 i can use all the setting i want but not in win2000 the setting 1152x864 85 hz
            that option is not posible only in 75hz wat i find to low on a 17 inch lyama visionmaster pro.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re:Lrngtofly...that must one big kickass
              monitor and videoca....hey an 8MB G200?
              that will support such a resolution at such
              a high refresh rate??
              P3-450 o/c 558
              Abit BH6
              128 PC100
              G400 SH 32M o/c MAX spex
              SB Live X-Gamer
              Pioneer 6X DVD
              Maxtor 10 Gig H.D.
              Fujitsu 13 Gig H.D.
              Win98 SE
              Samsung Synchmaster 17"
              Logitech C/L Mouse/Kybrd
              Altec Lansing ACS56
              oh yea! and a 3M Precise
              Mouse pad!!

              Comment


              • #8
                I suggest you check the monior driver..

                If win2k found wrong one, It may happen..

                Comment


                • #9
                  It's the monitor that is the difficult thing when it comes to high refresh rates. My monitor will actually go to 130 Hz at 1152X864, but the G200 has some imaging problems- so I set it back to 120Hz.

                  Memory has nothing to do with refresh rates.

                  Although my G200 does have 16MB. (a waste of $35)

                  [This message has been edited by LrngToFly (edited 06 March 2000).]

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X