No TurboGL for K6-2/3 users?

[Himself]

Was that supposed to be this release that TurboGL support for K6-2/3 cpus was implemented or is that ever going to
happen?

[Ant]

Matrox have made no official comment whatsoever whether there will or will not be Celeron, Pentium II, K6-II or K6-III support in future TurboGL releases. If you are all good girls and boys you never know what Santa might bring you

[UncleJoe]

Suppose it comes later if it comes at all...but Haig might know that best and maybe you should ask him about it ! (According Kruzin he is on vacation so maybe next week will bring the answer.)

J.

[Kruzin]

Ouch!
OW!
mmmmf....

Dammit...my tounge is bleeding from biting down on it so much....

At times. NDAs sure can be a pain

C'mon big M, make some sort of announcement...

[jediphoenix]

MUHAHAHAHAHAHA I smell a hint there Kruzin

------------------
***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***

[Himself]

Well, it's no odds to me, just curious, I just want to fill in the benchmarks on my home page with more impressive numbers on the G400 side. Right now, the TNT is looking good at resolutions below 1024x768.

(I don't actually use OpenGL for anything.)

[Antlergoat]

I'm am waiting on an official response from Matrox as to whether or not the Turbo drivers support the K6 III. I have seen a reference that says it is supported but I need to here from the source.
Lots of good info at this site that I found http://www.grafi.ii.pw.edu.pl/gbm/matrox/news.html

[Himself]

Well, the utility in the just released driver does not, I tried it under win95 and win98, no go. In fact if there is still a Win98 requirement I probably won't be using it anyway.

[jediphoenix]

What utility? where is it in the new drivers? just asking I wanted to try it with my k6-2 and win98

------------------
***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***

[Himself]

PDGLUtil.exe, it's in the archive. I even tried renaming the file manually with the first version but that didn't work.