Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

nvidia's road map

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    nvidia's road map

    Has anyone read this story on nvidia's plans for world pc domination? http://www.theregister.co.uk/991007-000007.html

    ------------------
    Get Paid to Surf the Web! <A HREF="http://www.alladvantage.com/home.asp?refid=CBM-295
    " TARGET=_blank>http://www.alladvantage.com/home.asp?refid=CBM-295
    </A>
    Asus K7V
    Athlon 700
    128mb PC133 HSDRAM
    Matrox Millennium g400max
    Adaptec 2940U2W
    IBM 9gb U2W
    Plextor 8/20 cdr
    Diamond MX300
    3com 905b-tx
    Tags: None
  • #2
    I've been road kill on NVIDIA's road map before, frankly, I'm burned out on NVIDIA, if someone says GeForce one more time I'm gonna puke.

    I agree with the NVIDIA == Intel theme though.

    Comment

    • #3
      lol
      ppl, u have to agree that GeForce is better than than g400, but there is to much hype, that is why I don't like Nvidia, cause for all the ppl who belive in hype, and hear "first ****ing GPU in the world" and gonna buy the card cause of that, so that is why NVIDIA SUX
      MATROX
      SGI
      INTERGRAPH
      WESTERN DIGTAL
      IBM
      MICROSOFT (you know i am right)
      ETC RULEZ

      ------------------
      Matrox Millennium G400 Dual Head - English
      Resolution 800*600
      Color Depth 16-bit Color
      Frame Buffer Triple buffering
      Refresh Rate VSync Off
      CPU Optimization AMD 3DNow!(tm)
      3DMark Result 5420.49 3DMarks
      Synthetic CPU 3D Speed 9142.76 CPU 3DMarks
      Rasterizer Score 2206.33 3DRasterMarks
      Game 1 - Race 63.58 FPS
      Game 2 - First Person 47.24 FPS
      Processor Type AMD-K7(tm) Processor
      Processor Speed 500 MHz
      Physical Memory 128 MB

      Matrox Millennium G400 Dual Head - English
      Resolution 800*600
      Color Depth 16-bit Color
      Frame Buffer Triple buffering
      Refresh Rate VSync Off
      CPU Optimization AMD 3DNow!(tm)
      3DMark Result 5420.49 3DMarks
      Synthetic CPU 3D Speed 9142.76 CPU 3DMarks
      Rasterizer Score 2206.33 3DRasterMarks
      Game 1 - Race 63.58 FPS
      Game 2 - First Person 47.24 FPS
      Processor Type AMD-K7(tm) Processor
      Processor Speed 500 MHz
      Physical Memory 128 MB

      Comment

      • #4
        better or just faster eh?

        jim

        ------------------
        PIII-500mhz @ 620!
        Abit BE6 mobo
        128mb pc-100
        Mill G400(YAHOO!!!) 32mb @ 120%)
        PD 5.30
        Maxtor 13.2 gb Uata66 hdd
        SB Live!
        Winblows 98se
        DX7
        THREE BIG FANS, six little ones and a case that sounds like a turbine engine...doh!


        System 1:
        AMD 1.4 AYJHA-Y factory unlocked @ 1656 with Thermalright SK6 and 7k Delta fan
        Epox 8K7A
        2x256mb Micron pc-2100 DDR
        an AGP port all warmed up and ready to be stuffed full of Parhelia II+
        SBLIVE 5.1
        Maxtor 40g 7,200 @ ATA-100
        IBM 40GB 7,200 @ ATA-100
        Pinnacle DV Plus firewire
        3Com Hardware Modem
        Teac 20/10/40 burner
        Antec 350w power supply in a Colorcase 303usb Stainless

        New system: Under development

        Comment

        • #5
          agh, faster

          )
          Matrox Millennium G400 Dual Head - English
          Resolution 800*600
          Color Depth 16-bit Color
          Frame Buffer Triple buffering
          Refresh Rate VSync Off
          CPU Optimization AMD 3DNow!(tm)
          3DMark Result 5420.49 3DMarks
          Synthetic CPU 3D Speed 9142.76 CPU 3DMarks
          Rasterizer Score 2206.33 3DRasterMarks
          Game 1 - Race 63.58 FPS
          Game 2 - First Person 47.24 FPS
          Processor Type AMD-K7(tm) Processor
          Processor Speed 500 MHz
          Physical Memory 128 MB

          Comment

          • #6
            faster AND better!

            and you know I'm right

            Comment

            • #7
              NoClue just wasted money on a Viper!
              I think he's trying to make himself feel better ;-p
              Mark F. (A+, Network+, & CCNA)
              --------------------------------------------------
              OH NO, my retractable cup holder swallowed a DVD...
              and burped out a movie

              Comment

              • #8
                well, I wouldn't call that wasted, actually the Viper looks good and was even cheaper than a NON MAX G400!

                btw: it works like a charm...too bad it has no EMBM...but then again, how many games make use of EMBM so far? (doh, trying to make me feel better again)

                actually I'd feel better with a G400 in my PC cause I had a G200 for one year now and I loved that card! But well, the Viper is cheaper, the drivers are more mature and it gets about the best out of my "old" P2-400 (Matrox is going to support only P3 and K7 with the TurboGL? ok, so I go for a TNT2 instead of a G400!)

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...
                X