Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

G400 32mb OEM won't work with Celeron266@448Mhz

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • G400 32mb OEM won't work with Celeron266@448Mhz

    I just installed a G400 Oem 32mb card to replace my G200 in my system with a
    Overclocked Celeron 266 @ 448Mhz

    Thing is that the card won't run in this configuration ( 4 x 112 Mhz) I
    have to run it at 400Mhz or at 448 but to set the
    AGP bus to 2/3 in the BIOS (motherboard: Abit BH6)

    What is wrong here? Doesn't the G400 cope with this speed (my G200 did).
    Or is there something wrong with the card maybe?

    Anyway, at 448Mhz on the Celeron and AGP bus at 2/3 speed i get 2906 in
    3Dmark99 at 800x600 16bit. is this too low?

    Do I lose much speed by having the AGP set to 2/3 ?


  • #2
    >Do I lose much speed by having the AGP set to 2/3 ?

    No, in fact you're still overclocking the AGP bus. (Which is quite useless)

    Comment


    • #3
      You're pushing the bus way past spec. No surprise it didn't handle 112Mhz, when it is designed for 67Mhz. At least Matrox makes cards that withstand much higher (eighties and up), but this is just a bonus.
      Nothing is wrong with your card, you're just not as lucky with this one as you were with your G200.

      Also, if you're really looking for a speed increase, change processors. It's amazing what an L2 cache can do.
      Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

      Comment


      • #4
        2/3 is what you should be running your AGP divider at with 100MHz and up FSB.

        And yes, that cacheless celery isn't helping much. Try to find a cheap 300a, and you'll see a large improvement in those scores.

        Comment


        • #5
          Large improvement in day-to-day desktop apps and benchmarks, but not much difference in games or rendering type apps. My 448 Cels still render StudioMax scenes faster than the PII400's at our office.
          Just for kicks, I'll run 3dMark when I get home, and we can compare scores.

          ------------------
          --My Stuff
          Cel266@448,Asus P2B 1009 bios,128MB,16MB G400 (w/ augmented ventilation),Quantum Obsidian,Panasonic 17" S70,MX300,Fujitsu 5.25GB,Dlink 530CT+, 1 grey Cat, 1 orange Cat

          Games Box
          --------------
          Windows 2000Pro, ASUS A7Pro, Duron 750@950, 192MB Micron PC133, OEM Radeon DDR, 15gb Quantum Fireball+ LM, Fujitsu 5.25gb, Pioneer 32x slot load CDROM, SB Live! Value, LinkSys LNE100, Altec Lansing ACS45.2, Samsung Syncmaster 955DF, Sycom 300va UPS

          Video Box
          ------
          Windows 2000Pro, PIII700 on ASUS CUBX, 256mb Micron PC133, Vanilla G400/32 (PD5.14), Hauppage WinTV-DBX, LinkSys LNE100, 8.4gb Maxtor HD, 40gb 7200 Western Digital, Diamond Fireport 40 SCSI, Pioneer 32x SCSI Slot load CDROM, Pioneer 10x Slot load DVD, Yamaha 4416s burner, MX300, Panasonic Panasync S70

          Feline Tech Support
          -------------
          Jinx the Grey Thundercat, Mischa (Shilsner?)(still MIA)

          ...currently working on the world's first C64 based parallel computing project

          Comment


          • #6
            You'll see an improvement on the G400, since it (for some reason) does a LOT better with cache. It's a function of the drivers, I think.

            - Slarty

            ------------------
            I used to be a guy named Gurm. I used to have a signature. But that's all gone now. Now, my name is Ash... and I am a slave.

            Comment


            • #7
              It does seem like your 3dmark score is low, with my celeron 464A I get 4096 3dmarks at 800X600 16-bit...Are you using the max version??
              Celeron 566@877 1.8V, 256meg generic PC-100 RAM (running at CAS2) Abit BH6, G400 16meg DH@150/200, Western Digital Expert 18gig, Ricoh mp7040A(morphed to mp7060A) Pioneer 6X DVD slot load, Motorola Cable Modem w/DEC ethernet card, Soundblaster Live Value Ver. 2, Viewsonic GT 775

              Comment


              • #8
                Hey Maniac,

                The reason you get higher scores in 3dmark is that your Celeron chip has 128k cache on it, while Sy-Klone's celeron does not. It does make a big difference in those kinds of tests like 3dmark.

                Comment

                Working...
                X