Hi. I'm quite new here, and I have a question about G400's multi-texturing support.
I found a 3DMark99Max results of G400 at a Japanese web site today. What intersted me was the fill rate scores of with and without muti-texturing. Without multi-texturing, the score is 207.0, and with multi-texturing, the score is 206.3! They are the same!
As far as I know, the score shoud be almost doubled when multi-texturing is enabled. As seen in TNT2's score shown in the page as comparision, they are 128.4 and 235.4 respectively, showing multi-texturing is working correctly.
I wonder if this is because of a driver problem or the chip it self has a flaw with multi-tex feature... Or this is what G400 chips are?
As a future G400MAX user, I'm very interested in this. Could somebody tell me what is behind this.
Excuse my lousy English.
Thanks.
I found a 3DMark99Max results of G400 at a Japanese web site today. What intersted me was the fill rate scores of with and without muti-texturing. Without multi-texturing, the score is 207.0, and with multi-texturing, the score is 206.3! They are the same!
As far as I know, the score shoud be almost doubled when multi-texturing is enabled. As seen in TNT2's score shown in the page as comparision, they are 128.4 and 235.4 respectively, showing multi-texturing is working correctly.
I wonder if this is because of a driver problem or the chip it self has a flaw with multi-tex feature... Or this is what G400 chips are?
As a future G400MAX user, I'm very interested in this. Could somebody tell me what is behind this.
Excuse my lousy English.
Thanks.
Comment