Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TurboGL and W2K

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TurboGL and W2K

    Hi...

    isnt there a TurboGL for W2K?? the old ones dont work anymóre..


    -Jannik

  • #2
    No there is no TurboGL for win2k. As a matter of fact,the current drivers for win2k are almost as fast as the TurboGL drivers for win98. With about a 2%-5% drop.. not significant.

    ------------------
    PIII-500, 128 MB, G400 MAX DH on, ABIT BH6, MX300
    Win98SE drivers: 5.50.01
    Win2K drivers: beta 5.01
    In case it's a harware problem:
    PIII-500@560, 256 MB, G400 MAX DH on, ABIT BH6, MX300
    Win2K drivers: 5.52

    Comment


    • #3
      oops, new profile

      ------------------
      PIII-500, 256 MB, G400 MAX DH on, ABIT BH6, MX300
      Win2K drivers: beta 5.03
      In case it's a harware problem:
      PIII-500@560, 256 MB, G400 MAX DH on, ABIT BH6, MX300
      Win2K drivers: 5.52

      Comment


      • #4
        Are there plans for a TurboGL or newer drivers? I saw a 30% decrease in frames (60 -> 40) in Quake 3 and 45% decrease (130 - 70) in Quake 1 when I migrated to Windows 2000 from 98. I'm also getting that "rainbow" effect in GLQuake that requires me to turn off dynamic lighting.

        Comment


        • #5
          2-5%?

          Um, no.

          Online CS is typically 40-70 for me & 98. 40 is fairly rare, but happens in those situtations if you know what I mean.

          Under W2k AS with optimized for applications (default is backround for S and AS, otherwise I'd blame it on that) and renaming the stupid file (barfs otherwise) it was in the 30-50 range, and it was more in the 30 than the 50.


          Athlon 800
          256mb
          g400 max

          Comment

          Working...
          X