Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here are my G400/K6-2 450 3dmark99 scores, does it look like all is well?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Here are my G400/K6-2 450 3dmark99 scores, does it look like all is well?

    Test My Project
    Rendering Platform Matrox Millennium G400 - English
    Resolution 800*600
    Color Depth 16-bit Color
    Frame Buffer Triple buffering
    Refresh Rate VSync Off
    CPU Optimization AMD 3DNow!(tm)
    3DMark Result 3232.68 3DMarks
    Synthetic CPU 3D Speed 6243.87 CPU 3DMarks
    Rasterizer Score 2051.79 3DRasterMarks
    Game 1 - Race 35.96 FPS
    Game 2 - First Person 29.36 FPS
    Fill Rate 205.54 MTexels/s
    Fill Rate With Multi-Texturing 199.21 MTexels/s
    2MB Texture Rendering Speed 271.18 FPS
    4MB Texture Rendering Speed 215.41 FPS
    8MB Texture Rendering Speed 151.70 FPS
    16MB Texture Rendering Speed 113.79 FPS
    32MB Texture Rendering Speed 65.63 FPS
    Bump Mapping Emboss, 3-pass 82.00 FPS
    Bump Mapping Emboss, 2-pass 105.84 FPS
    Bump Mapping Emboss, 1-pass 174.24 FPS
    Point Sample Texture Filtering Speed 110.22 %
    Bilinear Texture Filtering Speed 100.00 %
    Trilinear Texture Filtering Speed 69.31 %
    Anisotropic Texture Filtering Speed 0.00 %
    6 Pixel/individual 721.29 KPolygons/s
    6 Pixel/strips 1690.27 KPolygons/s
    25 Pixel/individual 648.56 KPolygons/s
    25 Pixel/strips 1454.71 KPolygons/s
    50 Pixel/individual 587.60 KPolygons/s
    50 Pixel/strips 1167.17 KPolygons/s
    250 Pixel/individual 341.20 KPolygons/s
    250 Pixel/strips 485.76 KPolygons/s
    1000 Pixel/individual 136.34 KPolygons/s
    1000 Pixel/strips 164.22 KPolygons/s
    Processor Type AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor
    Processor Speed 450 MHz
    L1 Cache size 64 KB
    L2 Cache size None
    Physical Memory 128 MB



    ------------------
    ***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***
    <A HREF="http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
    " TARGET=_blank>http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
    </A>

  • #2
    HI, I have celeron 400 oc 450 with 96 mb and I got 3653 with your settings. In 1024*768*32 i got 3578, but with 16 bit z buffer. With 32 bit z buffer I got 3307

    Comment


    • #3
      Damn that is not good for me are SS& that bad for AGP?

      ------------------
      ***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***
      <A HREF="http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
      " TARGET=_blank>http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
      </A>

      Comment


      • #4
        Seems strange that your cpu3dmarks are so high and you actual frame rate numbers are relatively low. On my system I get 4060 3Dmarks at your setting. ( I use 16-bit Z)

        ------------------
        Celeron 300A@464 2.0V, Abit BH6 G400 16meg DH@150/200, Western Digital Expert 18gig, Ricoh mp7040A, Pioneer 6X DVD slot load, Motorola Cable Modem w/DEC ethernet card, Soundblaster Live Value Ver. 2, Viewsonic GT 775


        Celeron 566@877 1.8V, 256meg generic PC-100 RAM (running at CAS2) Abit BH6, G400 16meg DH@150/200, Western Digital Expert 18gig, Ricoh mp7040A(morphed to mp7060A) Pioneer 6X DVD slot load, Motorola Cable Modem w/DEC ethernet card, Soundblaster Live Value Ver. 2, Viewsonic GT 775

        Comment


        • #5
          man then why am I getting the low frame rates? are socket 7 mobos that bad at AGP implementation? This is really disheartning

          ------------------
          ***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***
          <A HREF="http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
          " TARGET=_blank>http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
          </A>

          Comment


          • #6
            ok this is wierd, i went into G400tweak and turned on the 32bit z-buffer, i would think that would slow stuff down but look at the jump in my 3dmark score and cpu score from the last one I posted and notice now I lose no fill rate with multitexturing?

            Test My Project
            Rendering Platform Matrox Millennium G400 - English
            Resolution 800*600
            Color Depth 16-bit Color
            Frame Buffer Triple buffering
            Refresh Rate VSync Off
            CPU Optimization AMD 3DNow!(tm)
            3DMark Result 3288.10 3DMarks
            Synthetic CPU 3D Speed 6385.53 CPU 3DMarks
            Rasterizer Score 2105.95 3DRasterMarks
            Game 1 - Race 36.62 FPS
            Game 2 - First Person 29.84 FPS
            Fill Rate 205.21 MTexels/s
            Fill Rate With Multi-Texturing 205.25 MTexels/s
            2MB Texture Rendering Speed 296.01 FPS
            4MB Texture Rendering Speed 231.68 FPS
            8MB Texture Rendering Speed 160.27 FPS
            16MB Texture Rendering Speed 119.35 FPS
            32MB Texture Rendering Speed 67.58 FPS
            Bump Mapping Emboss, 3-pass 82.35 FPS
            Bump Mapping Emboss, 2-pass 105.79 FPS
            Bump Mapping Emboss, 1-pass 174.87 FPS
            Point Sample Texture Filtering Speed 110.86 %
            Bilinear Texture Filtering Speed 100.00 %
            Trilinear Texture Filtering Speed 68.64 %
            Anisotropic Texture Filtering Speed 0.00 %
            6 Pixel/individual 722.43 KPolygons/s
            6 Pixel/strips 1688.66 KPolygons/s
            25 Pixel/individual 647.57 KPolygons/s
            25 Pixel/strips 1453.01 KPolygons/s
            50 Pixel/individual 575.88 KPolygons/s
            50 Pixel/strips 1175.68 KPolygons/s
            250 Pixel/individual 346.04 KPolygons/s
            250 Pixel/strips 485.98 KPolygons/s
            1000 Pixel/individual 136.54 KPolygons/s
            1000 Pixel/strips 163.92 KPolygons/s
            Processor Type AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor
            Processor Speed 450 MHz
            L1 Cache size 64 KB
            L2 Cache size None
            Physical Memory 128 MB

            ------------------
            ***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***
            <A HREF="http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
            " TARGET=_blank>http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
            </A>

            Comment


            • #7
              Since no one else has confirmed it for you, yes, SS7 boards are pretty bad with AGP. Most of them can't even do AGP2X consistently. I know from experience. The reason is basically cause AGP was created by Chipzilla, so their BX chipset has very good support. However, no other chipset maker has created a good AGP implementation of AGP somewhat out of fear of Chipzilla.
              So, the short answer to your problem is that while you can get really good CPU scores from your K6-X, you won't even be able to get AGP 2X which will kill everything.

              HedsSpaz

              AMD K6-2 350 oc 400
              Asus P5A
              128 mb PC100 SDRAM
              8.4gb WD HD
              13.5gb IBM HD
              Mill G200 AGP
              Win98 SE
              Win2k RC2
              RedHat 6.1
              Primary System:
              MSI 745 Ultra, AMD 2400+ XP, 1024 MB Crucial PC2100 DDR SDRAM, Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro, 3Com 3c905C NIC,
              120GB Seagate UDMA 100 HD, 60 GB Seagate UDMA 100 HD, Pioneer DVD 105S, BenQ 12x24x40 CDRW, SB Audigy OEM,
              Win XP, MS Intellimouse Optical, 17" Mag 720v2
              Seccondary System:
              Epox 7KXA BIOS 5/22, Athlon 650, 512 MB Crucial 7E PC133 SDRAM, Hercules Prophet 4500 Kyro II, SBLive Value,
              3Com 3c905B-TX NIC, 40 GB IBM UDMA 100 HD, 45X Acer CD-ROM,
              Win XP, MS Wheel Mouse Optical, 15" POS Monitor
              Tertiary system
              Offbrand PII Mobo, PII 350, 256MB PC100 SDRAM, 15GB UDMA66 7200RPM Maxtor HD, USRobotics 10/100 NIC, RedHat Linux 8.0
              Camera: Canon 10D DSLR, Canon 100-400L f4.5-5.6 IS USM, Canon 100 Macro USM Canon 28-135 f3.5-5.6 IS USM, Canon Speedlite 200E, tripod, bag, etc.

              "Any sufficiently advanced technology will be indistinguishable from magic." --Arthur C. Clarke

              Comment


              • #8
                actually agp2x is working fine for me on my system Headspaz

                ------------------
                ***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***
                <A HREF="http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
                " TARGET=_blank>http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
                </A>

                Comment


                • #9
                  jediphoenix:

                  Why do you have no L2 cache?

                  ------------------
                  Chris Blake

                  Epox MVP3G5, K6III450, 256Mb RAM, G400Max DH, SBLive! Value and whole load of other stuff
                  Chris Blake

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Q: 3DMark shows that I have no L2 Cache. I have an AMD K6 or K6-2 CPU.
                    A: On your system, the L2 Cache is on the motherboard, and can't be detected correctly.


                    ------------------
                    ***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***
                    <A HREF="http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
                    " TARGET=_blank>http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
                    </A>

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      So why does someones system with a celeron 300a@464 and a g400 16 meg get a 3dmark99 max score of 4060 and my K6-2 450 128 SDRAM and g400 32 meg only gets 3288 ???? Please explain

                      ------------------
                      ***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***
                      <A HREF="http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
                      " TARGET=_blank>http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
                      </A>

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Dear jediphoenix, I have two explanations, choose the one you like:

                        1) Celeron 300a has an integrated L2 cache
                        2) floating point is faster in Celeron, and the 3dnow! optimisation, if they exist, are not very good.

                        M.
                        year2000:Athlon500/MSI6167/256M/10GIBM/6GSamsung/18GSCSI IBM/CL2xDVD/RR-G/HPPSPrinter/G400DH32M/DeltaDC995/MX300/ADSPyro1394/AHA2940UW/3comXL100

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X