Tweet
Quake III and UT performance on K6-2 450/G400 32 SH
Hello again its me, still trying to get rid of the murcette cape 
I have a question. How well should I expect to run quake 3 with my current setup? UT in no problem, i get 38 fps at 1280 x 1024 16 bit all high quality but in quake 3 I get 20.5 fps at 1024 x 768 16bit medium textures. I understand that I will not see the same fps as the K7/P3 users because I cant use the turbogl but I just want to know if its running like it should. Thx Jediphoenix
Current system:
K6-2 450
128 meg sdram
G400 32 SH OEM non-max (but got lucky it has max heatsink and 5ns SGRAM) (agp2x and busmastering operational and humming)
8.4 gig WD UDMA-33
AWE 64 value
Toshiba DVD-rom 6x
HP surestore 7200i re-writable
CTX VL710 17"
FIC PA-2013 Rev. 2.0
Win98
------------------
***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***
I have a question. How well should I expect to run quake 3 with my current setup? UT in no problem, i get 38 fps at 1280 x 1024 16 bit all high quality but in quake 3 I get 20.5 fps at 1024 x 768 16bit medium textures. I understand that I will not see the same fps as the K7/P3 users because I cant use the turbogl but I just want to know if its running like it should. Thx JediphoenixCurrent system:
K6-2 450
128 meg sdram
G400 32 SH OEM non-max (but got lucky it has max heatsink and 5ns SGRAM) (agp2x and busmastering operational and humming)
8.4 gig WD UDMA-33
AWE 64 value
Toshiba DVD-rom 6x
HP surestore 7200i re-writable
CTX VL710 17"
FIC PA-2013 Rev. 2.0
Win98
------------------
***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***
Comment