What with UT and K6's?

[DarkSyd]

What gives with the UT/K6 scores? We've got two people posted in the hardware forum getting above 30fps at 1024x32bit, one getting above 30 at 1280x16 bit. In the meantime I'm stuck below 30 at 1024x16bit (32bit unplayable at any res), With a Cel 550, and detail at medium.
If I want to be competitive, I have to run in Glide. What gives?

DS


------------------
Cel 366@550 on Asus P2b (1011), 128MB, OEM G400/16 (PD5.30 115%), Quantum Obsidian S12, Fujitsu 5.25gb, Maxtor 4.3gb, Pioneer slot load 32X, MX300 (Aureal 2040), Intel EtherExpress 16, Grey Cat, Orange Cat (still MIA)

[jediphoenix]

Well I am running UT with all high quality on and at 1280x1024 16 bit and am getting 38FPS with a K6-2 450 and 128 megs of SDRam. But I am running a G400 32 meg non max whereas u are running a 16 megger, maybe my extra 16 megs makes a difference. Also i was lucky and got one of the non-max cards which still has 5ns sgram on it though im not overclocking the card at all because I believe that I am cpu limited. Feel free to email me if you would like, maybe I can help further

------------------
***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***

[Antlergoat]

everthing set high, 1024 x768 and I'm getting 45 + fps
AMD K63 400mhz
128 pc100
Epox MVP3G M board
G400 32 meg Dual Head @ 125mhz
PwrDsk 5.41

[fiddlerboy]

well, .338 was around 20 fps, but .348 (these are the demos, I don't have the full version) gives about 30 at 640 and 16bit, and only slightly less at 800, but then, I'm running a G200 and a K6-2 350, so quite a bit below your systems.

but 32 bit is more-or-less unplayable for me as well. I assume that would be the G200 there.

(oh: medium detail, for what it matters)